Revision summary
Older farmers’ movements centred regional price and surplus growers. Contemporary protests are longer, more national and media-scaled. MSP and farm-law politics recast the demand public. Some inclusion of women and ecology appears in slogans. Dalit labour still sits at the edge of the kisan course.
Model answer
Introduction
Yes, contemporary farmers’ movements have changed course in organisation, demand, and public, while still speaking an older kisan language of land, price, and honour.
Body
Older course
- Kisan Sabha, Tebhaga, and later new farmers’ movements around the 1980s stressed prices, subsidies, and a Bharat versus India frame, often led by surplus-caste commercial growers.
- Class of labour was thinner in that course than Desai would want.
What is changing
- MSP, repeal of farm laws, and federal bargaining made a national simultaneous public through media, an opportunity structure, not the root cause.
- Alliances across Punjab, Haryana, and western UP showed unions that can sit months at a border, a new duration and logistics.
- Some platforms now name labour, women farmers, and ecological water, a wider course than tractor-only prosperity.
- Caste tensions remain: dominant-caste leadership versus Dalit farm labour, so the course is not a simple class unification.
What persists
- Landed kisan identity, procurement politics, and suspicion of corporate contract farming.
- Village factions can split a ‘kisan’ public locally.
Discussion
- The course is more national, more mediatised, and somewhat more inclusive in slogan.
- The agrarian class map still decides who can stay at the protest and who must return to wage work.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD OLD[Price kisan unions] --> NEW[National MSP media sit-ins] NEW --> W[Wider slogans] CL[Landless labour] --> LIM[Incomplete class course]
Conclusion
Contemporary farmers’ movements are changing course toward longer, national, media-visible campaigns around MSP and corporate farming. They have not become a mazdoor movement. Change is real in method and scale, incomplete in class.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Colonial administrators helped to construct the very traditionalism which marked the Indian society as "backward'. Comment critically.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Did they become anti-caste movements?
Not as a rule. Some solidarity appeared; leadership remains largely landed.
-
Is media the new cause?
Media scaled them. Surplus, price and law remain the cause.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Define ethnicity . Discuss the factors responsible for the growth of ethenic movements in India. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Bring out the various issues involved in Dalit movements in India. -
2021 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is identity politics? Discuss the main trends in Dalit movements in India -
2020 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Evaluate the nature and scope of anthropogenic influence on Climate in India and also analyze the environmental movements arising out of it. -
2019 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India -
2018 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the dynamics of neo-farmers movement in contemporary India. -
2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate the 'Me Too' Movement and its impact in India. -
2018 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elaborate various forms of Dalit assertions in contemporary India? Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.