Revision summary
DEMARU states combined prosperity with missing girls. Patriliny, dowry, and smaller families raised the premium on sons. Ultrasound converted preference into selection. Law against sex selection is necessary and not enough. Daughter property and a change in kinship honour are the deeper solutions.
Model answer
Introduction
DEMARU named a belt of prosperous states with alarmingly low child sex ratios. The puzzle is that wealth and literacy did not produce daughters. Causes sit in patriliny, dowry, and technology. Solutions must hit incentives and honour, not only clinics.
Body
Causes
- Leela Dube’s Seed and Earth: the son continues the line; the daughter is a field given away.
- Dowry and hypergamy in north-western kinship make a girl a lifetime cost, as Irawati Karve’s northern pattern would predict.
- Green Revolution property and smaller families intensified the need for one successful son, not for more children who might be girls.
- Ultrasound and abortion turned preference into sex selection, a modern tool for an old ideology.
- Agrarian honour, khap-like controls, and women’s weak land titles close alternatives.
Why these states
- Prosperity bought machines. It did not buy gender equality, a disharmonic outcome in Beteille’s sense.
Solutions
- Enforce the sex-selection ban without driving it only underground; watch clinics and advertisements.
- Daughter property rights that actually transfer land, not only paper law.
- Cash schemes help at the margin; they fail if marriage still drains the natal house.
- Public naming of missing girls, school, and women’s work that make a daughter an asset in the parents’ old age.
- Change the kinship maths: without a dent in Seed and Earth, ratios rebound.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SE[Seed Earth dowry] --> PF[Son preference] US[Ultrasound] --> SS[Sex selection] PF --> SS SS --> LR[Low child sex ratio] LD[Land rights for daughters] --> FX[Possible rise]
Conclusion
Low female sex ratios in DEMARU states are caused by patrilineal honour plus cheap sex-selection technology in property-rich regions. Solutions are legal, economic, and cultural together. Prosperity without a change in who counts as the seed will keep daughters missing.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Despite gains from the women's gender movement and states policy of women empowerment, gender equality is far from achieved. Identify two major challenges the prevent this goal from being reached
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is education enough to raise the ratio?
Educated prosperous districts have been among the worst. Education without property and honour change is weak.
-
Do schemes like cash for girls work?
They help survival and schooling. They rarely beat dowry and land ideology alone.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society -
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ? -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ? -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the problems relating to the "creamy layer". -
2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
To what extent does nation building depends on strengthening of pluralities in Indian society?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.