Revision summary
Caste and gender are the two fundamental discrimination axes in India. Caste grades touch, marriage, and work; gender grades property and the body. Law and politics have changed their public legitimacy. Endogamy, atrocity, unpaid care, and violence persist. Class, faith, and tribe matter, often through these two axes.
Model answer
Introduction
The two fundamental axes of social discrimination in India are caste, including its untouchability pole, and gender as organised by kinship. Class, religion, and tribe cut across them. They are changing in form more than they are ending as structures.
Body
Axis one: caste
- Graded inequality, endogamy, and disability, as Ambedkar and G. S. Ghurye’s feature lists both underline in different ways.
- M. N. Srinivas showed local dominance can outweigh ritual rank, yet labour and marriage still discriminate.
- Change: law, vote, and a reserved middle class. Persistence: atrocity, segregated work, and marriage ads.
Axis two: gender
- Seed and Earth, property, and honour make women a discriminated sex-class inside every caste.
- Public violence and unpaid care are the everyday form.
- Change: schooling, law, and some office. Persistence: sex ratio, domestic violence, and proxy politics.
Why these two are fundamental
- They organise who may marry, inherit, and be touched, which class alone does not explain.
- Religion and ethnicity matter, as do Adivasi land losses. They often work through caste-like ranking and gendered honour.
Are they changing?
- Andre Beteille’s disharmonic structure: equality is the official axis, discrimination the practical one.
- Yogendra Singh: recombination, not disappearance.
- A. R. Desai: class change without a full end to ascriptive labour.
- Urban anonymity and markets muddle everyday rank; they do not dissolve the two axes.
Interaction
- Dalit women show the intersection: two axes at once, not an average of both.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CA[Caste endogamy labour] --> D[Discrimination] GE[Gender property honour] --> D CH[Law vote school] --> MD[Change of form] D --> MD
Conclusion
Caste and gender are the two fundamental axes of Indian discrimination because they structure intimacy, labour, and honour. They are changing: more public equality, more identity politics, more law. They are not finished: endogamy and patriarchy still sort life chances.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Anti-Brahmanical movements during the colonial period
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
Why not class as a fundamental axis?
Class is real and organises surplus. In India it is still scheduled through caste and gender in marriage and dirty work.
-
Has urban life ended the axes?
It muddles some public rank. Marriage and inheritance still carry them.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Yogendra Singh's thesis on 'Modernization of Indian Traditoion'. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Colonial administrators helped to construct the very traditionalism which marked the Indian society as "backward'. Comment critically. -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you think that the Indian saints have brought about social reform and awareness in Indian society? Explain -
2019 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that social movements are caused by opportunity structures that are generated by media? Why? -
2017 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Yogendra singh's thesis on Modernization of Indian Tradition. And evaluate its applicability in the present day context -
2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Anti-Brahmanical movements during the colonial period -
2015 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the paradigm of modernization of Indian tradition in analyzing social change in India. -
2015 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the impact of post- 1970 feminist movement on Indian middle class.
More from this topic
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the social background of growth of indian nationalism.
Impact of colonial rule on Indian society
Colonial markets, land settlements and racial rule created a shared political field. Desai read nationalism as a bourgeois-democratic movement with internal class limits. Print, law and associations made a pan-Indian public. Caste and religion organised people and also split the nation. Peasants and workers entered through material conflicts, not only through elite speech.
Q3(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Yogendra Singh's thesis on 'Modernization of Indian Traditoion'.
Impact of colonial rule on Indian society
Singh treats Indian tradition as modernizing from inside and through contact. Orthogenetic and heterogenetic sources explain uneven cultural change. Sanskritization, caste associations and a secular Constitution fit the thesis. Desai, Beteille, Dube and Ambedkar show class, disharmony, gender and Dalit rupture. Use the thesis as a cultural map, not as a full political economy.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Colonial administrators helped to construct the very traditionalism which marked the Indian society as "backward'. Comment critically.
Impact of colonial rule on Indian society
Colonial census, law and ethnography froze custom as India’s essence. That traditionalism justified rule and selective reform. Precolonial hierarchy existed; the Raj simplified it into a backward whole. Indian elites both defended and attacked the constructed tradition. Desai and field sociology relocate backwardness in colonial capitalism and living rank.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.