Revision summary
Creamy layer is the relatively well-off slice inside a reserved category. It was meant to stop quota capture by the already mobile. Measurement of income and assets is crude and contested. The phrase is also a political weapon against reservation. Class split inside caste is real; it does not end caste.
Model answer
Introduction
Creamy layer names the better-off slice inside a reserved backward class that can capture quotas meant for the more excluded. The problem is both justice inside the group and the political use of the phrase to attack reservation itself.
Body
What the idea does
- The Supreme Court’s Indra Sawhney line treated creamy layer as a filter for OBCs, so reservation would not become a hereditary office for the already mobile.
- It assumes class can be measured inside caste: income, farm size, and parental posts.
Problems of justice
- A small OBC or Dalit middle class may monopolise seats while landless kin remain outside colleges, which A. R. Desai’s class eye would predict.
- Cut-offs and certificates are blunt. Rural assets hide; urban salaries show.
- Sub-quota and caste census debates arise because creamy layer does not by itself rank the most backward jatis.
Problems of politics
- The phrase is used to say reservation has ‘done its job’, which ignores continuing endogamy and atrocity.
- Andre Beteille’s disharmony remains: a creamy-layer officer still faces ranked honour in marriage.
- Excluding the creamy layer without expanding quality education can simply return seats to historically forward groups.
Usable account
- Creamy layer is a real intra-group class split. It is not proof that caste has ended.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CL[Creamy layer] --> CAP[Quota capture] CL --> MS[Measurement disputes] CL --> POL[Political attack on reservation] CST[Caste persists] --> CL
Conclusion
The creamy-layer problem is capture of quota by the mobile few, crude measurement, and bad-faith use against reservation. An account that keeps class inside caste is sociological. An account that treats caste as finished is not.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you agree that the issue of child labour raises questions about and beyond the informal sector ? Give reasons.
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Should SC/ST also have a creamy layer?
Law has treated those lists differently. Sociology still sees class splits inside Dalit groups.
-
Does excluding creamy layer equalise?
It can open seats downward. Without school quality, the next layer still loses to forward-caste capital.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society -
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ? -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ? -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions -
2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the causes and solutions for the low female sex-ratio in the DEMARU States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, and Gujarat ? -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
To what extent does nation building depends on strengthening of pluralities in Indian society?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.