Revision summary
Rural Dalit poverty is organised by landlessness, dominant caste, and open untouchability. Urban slum poverty is organised by informal dirty work and weak housing tenure. The city eases some ritual exclusion and adds eviction and rent. Class exploitation is shared; caste assigns the worst tasks in both places. Marriage and honour still follow the family across the rural–urban move.
Model answer
Introduction
A poor Dalit family faces graded inequality in both village and slum. The village problem is land, bonded work, and open honour. The slum problem is rent, informal wage, and a quieter but still spatial caste. Comparison shows different cages, not a free city.
Body
Rural setting
- Landlessness and dominant-caste farms organise labour, as Srinivas’s Rampura still suggests for local power.
- Untouchability at well, temple, and school can be public. Atrocity is a rural weapon.
- Housing may be a segregated hamlet; the state is the sarpanch and the police station.
Urban slum
- Work is construction, sanitation, leather, rag-picking, or domestic service: caste occupation recoded as informal labour.
- Tenure is illegal or weak; eviction and lack of water and toilets hit women hardest.
- Anonymity can ease some pollution rules, yet landlords, neighbours, and marriage still ask jati.
- Ambedkar saw the city as an exit. The slum is a partial exit: wages without dignity of housing.
Shared pressing problems
- Credit, health costs, children’s school dropout, and violence against women.
- A. R. Desai’s class eye: both are surplus labour. Caste decides the dirtiest tasks.
Contrast
- Rural: honour and land. Urban: rent and the municipal state.
- Neither family has escaped endogamy as the family’s future.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD R[Rural Dalit poor] --> L[Landless honour atrocity] U[Urban slum Dalit poor] --> I[Informal wage eviction] CST[Caste labour] --> R CST --> U
Conclusion
The rural Dalit poor family is trapped by agrarian dominance and open untouchability. The slum family is trapped by informal work and insecure shelter. City life thins some ritual insults and thickens market precarity. Both need land or tenure, and both need annihilation of caste in everyday institutions.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are the reason for the escalation of violence against women in the public domain ?
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the slum better than the hamlet?
Wages and some anonymity can be better. Tenure, toilets, and school may be worse.
-
Does migration end caste?
It relocates caste into labour markets and marriage. It does not dissolve it.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges in Implementing the Rural Development Programmes in India -
2019 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the changing democratic profile of India -
2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Has Green Revolution led to the formation of new power elite in rural India? Elaborate your answer. -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a note on Basic Services to Urban Poet (BSUP) and Integrated Housing and Slum Development (IHSD) programme provided for the urban poor. -
2017 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a short note a changing means of production and increased rural poverty -
2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for rural development -
2016 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write a note on the uneven impact of 'Green Revolution' on rural society. -
2015 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Effect of displacement through development on the rural landless and marginal farmers .
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.