Revision summary
Slums are the residential face of informal urban labour. Effects include service deficit, disease, and insecure tenure. Women carry extra water and care costs. The formal city depends on this cheap labour. Politics oscillates between eviction and patronage, not yet full urban citizenship.
Model answer
Introduction
Growing slums are the housing form of India’s urban informal economy. Their effects are overcrowding, insecure tenure, cheap labour for the city, and a politics of vote versus eviction.
Body
Housing and services
- Slums concentrate people without title, water, and sanitation. The city extracts labour while delaying citizenship of space.
- Women and children carry the water and disease load, a feminization of urban poverty.
Labour and class
- Slums house construction, domestic, and vending workers that Breman placed in the informal market.
- They subsidise formal India with cheap services next to malls, a spatial disharmony Beteille would recognise in another key.
Health and stigma
- TB, undernutrition, and fire risk are ecological effects. Caste clusters inside slums can repeat village rank.
Politics
- Patron parties trade stay against demolition. Rights-based housing and in-situ upgrade are the alternative to treating slums as only a nuisance.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MG[Rural migrant informal] --> SL[Slum] SL --> LB[Cheap city labour] SL --> HS[Health tenure deficit] SL --> VT[Vote eviction politics]
Conclusion
- Growing slums effect a dual city: growth on informal housing. The sociological task is tenure, services, and labour rights, not only clearance.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the changing nature of the problems of working class in the informal sector of the economy.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q6(b)). View answer →
-
Do slums exist because of illegal migrants only?
Most residents are Indian workers the city needs. Illegality of land is often the state’s planning failure.
-
Will more high-rises end slums?
Without affordable tenure and wages, high-rises relocate the poor to farther informal belts.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the causes, consequences and other concerns of growth of urban settlements in India. -
2019 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the concerns of growing urban displacement dynamics in India -
2019 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you think that 'demonetization' has accelerated the economic growth in India? How do you understand the in formalization of labour, underemployment and gender discrimination in this context? -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Construct a sociological narrative on the increasing trend of child abuse in India. -
2017 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the issue of child labour raises questions about and beyond the informal sector ? Give reasons. -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the impact of heritage tourism on urban socio-spatial patterns in India -
2016 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of the problems of working class in the informal sector of the economy. -
2015 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Issues relating to the informal labour market in urban India.
More from this topic
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the trend of urbanization in India. Do you think that Industrialization is the only precondition of urbanization? Give you arguments
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
India’s urbanisation is rising but remains metro-concentrated and full of census towns and slums. Kundu’s exclusionary urbanisation captures labour demand without inclusive housing. Tertiary growth, administrative history, transport and agrarian distress urbanise besides factories. Industrial belts exist and matter; they do not exhaust the trend. Policy that waits only for industry misses actually existing urban India.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you think that law has been able to abolish child labour in India? Comment.
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
The 1986 Act as amended in 2016 bans most child work under 14 but allows family-enterprise help. RTE adds a schooling right that is unevenly realised. Child labour persists in agriculture, kilns, domestic and home-based informal work. Poverty, caste occupations and weak inspection explain the gap between statute and practice. Law delegitimised the practice more than it abolished it.
Q2(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
'Agrarian class structure has been undergoing changes due to modern forces.' Critically examine
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
Thorner’s malik–kisan–mazdoor map still orients agrarian class, with caste as the usual skin. Land reform thinned intermediaries unevenly; ceilings and tenancy left loopholes. Green Revolution and commercial farming produced capitalist farmers and a larger hired workforce. MGNREGA, migration and peri-urban land markets further split classes. Change is real but not a uniform national shift from feudalism to pure agrarian capitalism.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.