Q4(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q4(a) Q4(c) →

What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism?

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Lived Hindu tenets centre dharma, karma, rebirth, and release, plus puja. Texts and village practice both matter; neither is the whole. Polytheism describes the pantheon; monism describes some elite theology. Sanskritization moves toward Sanskritic gods without erasing local ones. Sociology should refuse a yes-or-no missionary binary.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Hindu religion, sociologically, is a family of practices around dharma, karma, samsara, and varied gods, not a single church creed. Monotheism versus polytheism is the wrong forced choice; both languages exist inside a ranked social world.

Body

Basic tenets as lived

  • Dharma as duty by status and stage, karma and rebirth as moral accounting, and moksha as release, sit with puja, festival, and caste duty.
  • Ghurye and Indology stressed textual continuity. Srinivas’s field view showed village deities and dominant-caste temples as the working religion.
  • Dumont tied purity to the sacred. Bhakti and reform recast the same stock toward devotion and, sometimes, equality.

Mono and poly

  • Many gods and local devis look polytheist. Smarta and Vedantic talk of one Brahman looks monotheist or monist.
  • M. N. Srinivas noted Sanskritization as a shift toward Sanskritic deities without dropping the local pantheon.
  • Hindu nationalism may stress one people and one God-talk; household practice often remains many-godded.

Sociological close

  • The system is henotheistic in use: one god at a time, many in the year, ranked like society.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  T[Dharma karma samsara] --> P[Puja many deities]
  V[Vedanta one Brahman] --> M[Monist language]
  F[Field village gods] --> P

Conclusion

Hindu tenets are dharma, karma, rebirth, and a porous sacred cosmos. Hinduism is neither simply monotheist nor simply polytheist; it is a hierarchical pluralism that politics sometimes tries to flatten into one God, one people.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India?

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q4(c)). View answer →

  • Is Hinduism one religion?

    It is a civilisational cluster with family resemblance. Census and law treat it as one; practice is internally diverse.

  • Does bhakti make it monotheist?

    A bhakta may love one ishta. The social world around the bhakta usually remains many-godded.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2017 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    The main objective of socio- religious movement during the colonial rule in India were reforming and synthesizing Hinduism. Write any two such important movements

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Bring out the debates of 'insiders' and 'outsiders' approaches in understanding Indian society.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• The insider (emic) approach studies Indian society using native categories, sacred texts, and cultural immersion, championed by G.S. Ghurye and D.P. Mukerji. • Critics argue the insider view suffers from upper-caste bias and ignores ground realities in favor of normative texts. • The outsider (etic) approach applies universal models and comparative frameworks, famously used by Western scholars like Louis Dumont. • Critics dismiss the outsider view as orientalist reductionism that imposes Western concepts and misinterprets local idioms. • Modern Indian sociology bridges this binary through a reflexive methodology combining cultural familiarity with analytical rigor. • Ultimately, combining native insights with objective scrutiny is essential to capture India's complex social dynamics.

Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the challenges faced by the aged people in receiving 'elder care'.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• India's aging population faces severe elder care challenges due to the breakdown of traditional joint families and youth out-migration. • Over 80% of seniors lack formal pensions because they worked in the informal sector, worsening financial vulnerability. • High out-of-pocket medical costs for chronic illnesses quickly drain meager personal savings. • Public hospitals suffer from an acute shortage of geriatric specialists, dedicated wards, and rehabilitation facilities. • Implementation of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 remains weak, leaving legal tribunals overburdened. • Solutions require shifting from a welfare approach to a rights-based framework, combining community care networks with strict legal enforcement under Article 41.

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Compare G. S. Ghurye's and A. R. Desai's approaches used in understanding Indian society

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• **Ghurye’s Indological Approach:** Relied on sacred texts and classical literature to study Indian society through civilizational continuity. • **Core Themes in Ghurye:** Focused on caste, kin, and how Hinduism historically integrated diverse tribal and regional groups. • **Desai’s Materialist Approach:** Rejected textual idealism in favor of Marxist political economy to study social structures. • **Economic Formations:** Analyzed Indian society through successive modes of production—ancient, feudal, and colonial capitalist. • **Caste vs. Class:** Viewed caste and religion as superstructural elements that mask underlying economic exploitation. • **Critique of State and Nationalism:** Argued that the nationalist movement was bourgeois, leaving agrarian inequalities intact post-independence. • **Key Contrast:** Ghurye highlights cultural tradition and integration, while Desai emphasizes economic power and class conflict.

PDF