Revision summary
Social mobility is movement across strata in one life or across generations. Sorokin and later class analysis distinguished types of mobility, including structural change. A closed model centres ascription, endogamy and birth rank. An open model centres achievement, education and market class. Real societies mix the two, as Indian caste–class studies and Western elite closure both show. The classification is a useful type, not a complete map.
Model answer
Introduction
Social mobility is the movement of persons, families or groups from one position in a stratification system to another. The movement may be upward or downward, and it may occur in one life or across generations. Pitirim Sorokin made mobility a central topic. Closed and open models are classroom types of how such movement is supposed to work. A critical examination treats them as models, not as full photographs of any living society.
Body
What social mobility covers
Vertical mobility is a change of rank. Horizontal mobility is a change of position without a clear rise or fall, such as a move from one job to another of similar standing. Inter-generational mobility compares parent and child. Intra-generational mobility tracks one career. Structural mobility occurs when the whole occupational system expands, as when industry creates new white-collar posts. Exchange mobility is a zero-sum swap of winners and losers. Karl Marx expected class polarisation more than a large middle rise. Later class analysis, including John Goldthorpe’s work, measured actual rates. In India, the story of mobility is tied to education, reservation, migration and the informal sector.
Closed and open models
A closed model of stratification treats position as ascribed by birth. The ideal type is a caste or estate order with endogamy, ritual barriers and little legitimate individual climb. A slave order is even more closed. An open model treats position as achieved through talent, education and market success. The ideal type is a class or meritocratic order in which the child need not repeat the parent. Weber’s class, status and party already warn that honour can stay closed while markets look open.
The classification is useful as a first cut. It is weak if it is used as a simple contrast of “traditional India” and “modern West”. M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is group mobility inside a supposedly closed caste order. Dominant castes hold land and votes. Andre Beteille showed that class, caste and power do not always coincide. Industrial Britain had class closure through property and elite schools even while it preached openness. Reservation policy in India is an attempt to force openness in public employment against ascriptive closure. Marriage markets still close many paths that classrooms open.
A critical view therefore says that closed and open are poles on a scale. Every complex society mixes ascription and achievement. The ideology of an open society can hide inherited cultural capital, as Pierre Bourdieu argued. The ideology of a closed society can hide money and local power. Mobility studies must measure rates, barriers and group strategies rather than rest on the two labels alone.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SM[Social mobility] --> V[Vertical and horizontal] SM --> G[Inter and intra generational] CL[Closed model] --> ASC[Ascription caste estate] OP[Open model] --> ACH[Achievement class market] MIX[Real mix] --> CL MIX --> OP
Conclusion
Social mobility is movement across ranked positions in one life or across generations. Closed and open models name ascription and achievement as poles. They help teaching, but living systems mix caste honour, class property and state policy. Criticism begins when the labels are mistaken for whole societies.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How do you view and assess the increasing trend of digital ethnography and the use of visual culture in sociological research?
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is caste a perfectly closed system?
As a model it is closed by birth and marriage. In history, groups have moved through Sanskritisation, politics and class.
-
Does industrialisation automatically open stratification?
It changes occupational structure, but property, elite schooling and status honour can keep closure alive.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss social mobility in open and closed system. -
2020 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically assess social mobility in closed and open systems. -
2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In social mobility possible in closed systems of stratification ? Illustrate from research work. -
2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Vertical mobility brings structural change even in a closed social system." Comment -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"No society can either be completely open or completely closed." comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of Sociology. Highlight its relationship with Social Anthropology.
Sociology
Sociology is the systematic study of social relationships, institutions and structures. Its nature is empirical, comparative and theoretical, after Comte, Durkheim, Marx and Weber. Social anthropology studies culture and community life, often through intensive fieldwork. The two subjects share the study of institutions and meaning. They differ in typical scale, method and historical setting. Indian village studies show how the border has been crossed in practice.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the changing nature of caste as a status group.
Sociology
Weber’s status group is a community of honour, lifestyle and closure. Caste fits this through hierarchy, endogamy and ritual ranking described by Ghurye, Dumont and Ambedkar. Sanskritisation and the dominant caste show older strategies of status mobility and local power. Law, reservations and democratic politics have recast caste as a public identity. Urban class and occupation have loosened hereditary work more than they have loosened marriage. Change is real, but caste has not ceased to be a status group.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage as an institution has undergone a radical transformation from 'ritual' to 'commercial' in its outlook. Explain the factors behind this change.
Sociology
Older marriage was a ritual alliance of families, caste and honour. A commercial outlook prices grooms, dowry and wedding display. Hypergamy and scarce high-status jobs inflate the market. Media, urban consumption and the wedding industry make the ceremony a public show. Law against dowry exists, but practice still follows family bargaining. Ritual form can survive while the outlook becomes commercial.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.