Revision summary
Parsons: nuclear family specialises in socialisation and adult stability. Engels: family form follows property and women’s subordination. Oakley and Walby: housework and patriarchy as inequality. Mead and Levi-Strauss: roles and alliance. Census and NFHS show mixed Indian household forms.
Model answer
Introduction
The family is not one object. Functional, Marxist, feminist, and interactionist perspectives name different work that households do: socialisation, reproduction of labour, gendered unpaid care, and everyday performance of roles.
Body
Functional and modernisation views
- Talcott Parsons treated the isolated nuclear family as specialised in primary socialisation and adult personality stabilisation in industrial society.
- William J. Goode argued that industrialisation spreads a conjugal family form. Indian joint households, still visible in the Census, qualify that path.
Conflict and materialist views
- Friedrich Engels linked the monogamous family to private property and the subordination of women.
- The household reproduces labour-power for capital, often through unpaid care that wage tables miss.
Feminist perspectives
- Ann Oakley made housework visible. Sylvia Walby placed the household among structures of patriarchy.
- The family is a site of inequality and violence, not only of warmth. NFHS on decision-making and spousal violence is the Indian file.
Interaction and alliance
- George Herbert Mead’s self is first trained in the family game of roles.
- Claude Levi-Strauss treated alliance and the exchange of spouses as the elementary structure, which kinship studies in India still use beside caste endogamy.
Discussion
- No single perspective owns the family. Parsons explains role specialisation and hides unpaid gender.
- Engels and feminists explain power and miss some care as chosen solidarity.
- Use the set, and read SHG and migration households as changing forms, not as failed nuclear types.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FAM[Family] --> P[Parsons socialisation] FAM --> E[Engels property] FAM --> F[Feminist unpaid care] FAM --> I[Mead roles]
Conclusion
Perspectives on the family split along function, property, gender, and interaction. Parsons, Engels, Oakley, Mead, and Levi-Strauss still organise the debate. Indian Census and NFHS households show joint, nuclear, and female-headed mixes that no one theory saturates.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the implications of feminization of work in the developing societies.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Has the Indian joint family vanished?
Census still finds joint and supplemented nuclear forms. Goode’s linear story is too neat.
-
Is the family only oppression?
Feminist and Marxist views name power. Care and socialisation remain real functions, unequally distributed.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences. -
2022 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Durkhiem argued that society is more than the sum of individual acts. Discuss. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What aspects of Enlightenment do you think paved way for the emergence of sociology ? Elaborate. -
2022 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are the shortfalls of positivist philosophy that gave rise to the non-positivist methods of studying social reality ? -
2022 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Suggest measures to minimize the influence of the researchers in process of collecting data through focus group discussion. -
2022 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the implications of feminization of work in the developing societies. -
2022 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on global trends of secularization. -
2022 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do little tradition and great tradition coexist in contemporary Indian society ?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences.
Sociology
Sociology studies patterned relations among groups and institutions as a whole. Comte, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx named that object in different ways. Economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology cut the same life along one axis. Census and NFHS already show large-scale social structure. The limit is complementary science, not a takeover of every neighbouring field.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?
Sociology as Science
Interpretative research studies meaning, not only counts. Weber kept value-relevance in problem choice and demanded value-discipline in proof. Harding’s strong objectivity names the researcher’s location. Geertz, prolonged fieldwork, triangulation, and respondent checks test the reading. Empathy without evidence is not objectivity.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.
Social Change in Modern Society
Information is a report; data are information organised for a research question. Durkheim turned official suicide counts into sociological data by classification. Blumer warned that grids can freeze living meanings. Census and NFHS are public information until a defined indicator is built. Numbers alone do not make data.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.