Revision summary
Durkheim: religion is society in sacred form, through ritual and the church as moral community. Civil religion, rallies, and festivals still fit. Weber, Marx, and gender critique limit the group-mirror model. Secularisation is unfinished; Census and NFHS show mixed practice. Use Durkheim for solidarity; do not use him as the whole of contemporary religion.
Model answer
Introduction
Emile Durkheim treated religion as society worshipping its own ideal in sacred symbols. The sacred–profane split, collective effervescence, and the church as a moral community remain usable. They do not exhaust politics, markets, or inner faith in the present.
Body
What still travels
- The Elementary Forms located the sacred in group assembly, not in a supernatural being as such. National days, stadiums, and disaster rituals still produce effervescence.
- Robert Bellah’s civil religion in the United States is a Durkheimian reading of flags and founding myths.
- Indian public festivals and, in another key, mass political rallies, organise belonging through sacred-like marking of space and time.
Critical limits
- Max Weber stressed meaning, theodicy, and this-worldly asceticism. Contemporary evangelical and reformist currents are poorly read as only the group hugging itself.
- Karl Marx treated religion as protest and as a veil of class. Durkheim underplayed domination inside the “church”.
- Bryan Wilson and later secularisation debates asked whether differentiation shrinks the sacred. Durkheim expected cults of the individual, not simple disappearance.
- Gendered priesthood and caste in temples show that the moral community is stratified. Ann Oakley-style questions about whose sacred order is at work are needed.
- Census religion tables and NFHS on practice show persistence, switching, and private belief that a clan totem model only partly fits.
Verdict
- Relevant as a theory of ritual solidarity and of the sacred as social.
- Incomplete as a theory of salvation, organisation, and religious conflict in a media-saturated world.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Durkheim religion] --> S[Sacred profane] D --> E[Collective effervescence] D --> M[Moral community] S --> NOW[Rallies nations festivals] W[Weber Marx secularisation] --> LIM[Limits]
Conclusion
Durkheim remains relevant wherever groups make the sacred and bind themselves. Weber, Marx, and feminist and secularisation critiques show what his clan model misses: meaning, class, gender, and the unfinished death of the gods.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss various theoretical perspectives on family.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did Durkheim predict the end of religion?
He predicted new cults, including the cult of the individual, not a simple emptying of the sacred.
-
Is a cricket crowd a church?
It can be effervescence. It lacks a lasting moral community and a full sacred system in his strict sense.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine how Durkheim and Merton explicate Anomie. -
2022 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What characterizes degradation of work in capitalist society according to Marx ? -
2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Social stratification is claimed to contribute to maintenance of social order and stability in society. Critically assess. -
2022 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead the idea of self develops when the individual becomes self-conscious.Explain. -
2022 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse Parsons views on society as a social system. -
2021 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain whether Durkheim's theory of Division of Labour is relevant in the present day context -
2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically examine the dialectics involved in each mode of production as propounded by Karl Marx -
2021 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
With suitable examples, explain how conformity and deviance coexist in a society as propounded by R.K. Merton
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences.
Sociology
Sociology studies patterned relations among groups and institutions as a whole. Comte, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx named that object in different ways. Economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology cut the same life along one axis. Census and NFHS already show large-scale social structure. The limit is complementary science, not a takeover of every neighbouring field.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?
Sociology as Science
Interpretative research studies meaning, not only counts. Weber kept value-relevance in problem choice and demanded value-discipline in proof. Harding’s strong objectivity names the researcher’s location. Geertz, prolonged fieldwork, triangulation, and respondent checks test the reading. Empathy without evidence is not objectivity.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.
Social Change in Modern Society
Information is a report; data are information organised for a research question. Durkheim turned official suicide counts into sociological data by classification. Blumer warned that grids can freeze living meanings. Census and NFHS are public information until a defined indicator is built. Numbers alone do not make data.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.