Q5(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q4(b) Q6(a) →

Critically examine the relevance of Durkheim's views on religion in contemporary society.

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Durkheim: religion is society in sacred form, through ritual and the church as moral community. Civil religion, rallies, and festivals still fit. Weber, Marx, and gender critique limit the group-mirror model. Secularisation is unfinished; Census and NFHS show mixed practice. Use Durkheim for solidarity; do not use him as the whole of contemporary religion.

Model answer

Introduction

Emile Durkheim treated religion as society worshipping its own ideal in sacred symbols. The sacred–profane split, collective effervescence, and the church as a moral community remain usable. They do not exhaust politics, markets, or inner faith in the present.

Body

What still travels

  • The Elementary Forms located the sacred in group assembly, not in a supernatural being as such. National days, stadiums, and disaster rituals still produce effervescence.
  • Robert Bellah’s civil religion in the United States is a Durkheimian reading of flags and founding myths.
  • Indian public festivals and, in another key, mass political rallies, organise belonging through sacred-like marking of space and time.

Critical limits

  • Max Weber stressed meaning, theodicy, and this-worldly asceticism. Contemporary evangelical and reformist currents are poorly read as only the group hugging itself.
  • Karl Marx treated religion as protest and as a veil of class. Durkheim underplayed domination inside the “church”.
  • Bryan Wilson and later secularisation debates asked whether differentiation shrinks the sacred. Durkheim expected cults of the individual, not simple disappearance.
  • Gendered priesthood and caste in temples show that the moral community is stratified. Ann Oakley-style questions about whose sacred order is at work are needed.
  • Census religion tables and NFHS on practice show persistence, switching, and private belief that a clan totem model only partly fits.

Verdict

  • Relevant as a theory of ritual solidarity and of the sacred as social.
  • Incomplete as a theory of salvation, organisation, and religious conflict in a media-saturated world.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  D[Durkheim religion] --> S[Sacred profane]
  D --> E[Collective effervescence]
  D --> M[Moral community]
  S --> NOW[Rallies nations festivals]
  W[Weber Marx secularisation] --> LIM[Limits]

Conclusion

Durkheim remains relevant wherever groups make the sacred and bind themselves. Weber, Marx, and feminist and secularisation critiques show what his clan model misses: meaning, class, gender, and the unfinished death of the gods.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Critically examine how Durkheim and Merton explicate Anomie.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What characterizes degradation of work in capitalist society according to Marx ?

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Social stratification is claimed to contribute to maintenance of social order and stability in society. Critically assess.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    According to Mead the idea of self develops when the individual becomes self-conscious.Explain.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Critically analyse Parsons views on society as a social system.

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain whether Durkheim's theory of Division of Labour is relevant in the present day context

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Critically examine the dialectics involved in each mode of production as propounded by Karl Marx

    View answer →

  8. 2021 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    With suitable examples, explain how conformity and deviance coexist in a society as propounded by R.K. Merton

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.