Q1(d) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1 Q1 →

Explain whether Durkheim's theory of Division of Labour is relevant in the present day context

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Durkheim: specialisation shifts solidarity from likeness to interdependence. Global supply chains illustrate organic solidarity. Anomie and forced division of labour fit gig work, caste-typed jobs, and lockdown rupture. Marx and unpaid care mark the gaps. Relevant, not sufficient.

Model answer

Introduction

Emile Durkheim treated the division of labour as the move from mechanical solidarity of likeness to organic solidarity of interdependence. The map still reads factories, professions, and global supply chains. Abnormal forms also still read gig precarity and lockdown rupture.

Body

What still fits

  • Organic solidarity is visible when a phone, a vaccine, or a garment gathers parts and skills across countries.
  • Restitutive law, contracts, and professional ethics remain the glue of specialised work, as he expected.
  • The non-contractual basis of contract still matters: trust, standards, and logistics make exchange possible.

Abnormal forms today

  • Anomic division of labour appears when rules lag behind new trades, as in platform work without clear hours or security.
  • Forced division of labour appears when caste, gender, and race assign tasks irrespective of talent.
  • The 2020 reverse migration showed how urban organic links can snap when the state and firm treat labour as disposable.

Limits

  • Durkheim underplayed class exploitation that Marx placed at the centre of the same specialisation.
  • He did not theorise unpaid care, which Ann Oakley made visible as labour outside the factory map.
  • Relevance is high for interdependence and anomie; it is incomplete as a full political economy.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  DOL[Division of labour] --> MECH[Mechanical likeness]
  DOL --> ORG[Organic interdependence]
  ORG --> GVC[Global supply chains]
  ABN[Anomie forced DOL] --> GIG[Gig lockdown caste]

Conclusion

Durkheim’s division of labour remains relevant for global interdependence and for diagnosing anomie and forced specialisation. It is not a complete theory of gig work, care, or class. Use it with Marx and gender analysis.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Critically examine Max Weber's theory of Social Stratification.

    Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →

  • Does organic solidarity mean harmony?

    No. Durkheim already named abnormal forms. Interdependence can be unequal.

  • Is the theory only about factories?

    No. Professions, science, and now cross-border logistics are the same problem of moral density.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Critically examine the dialectics involved in each mode of production as propounded by Karl Marx

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    With suitable examples, explain how conformity and deviance coexist in a society as propounded by R.K. Merton

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Do you think Talcott Parsons gave an adequate theory of social change? Justify your answer

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Highlight the roles and functions of civil society in a democratic system.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views.

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change.

    View answer →

  7. 2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions.

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Do you think ethnomethodology helps us in getting reliable and valid data ? Justify your answer

Sociology

Garfinkel studies members’ methods, indexicality, and accountability. That can validate how categories are produced, including official ones. Reliability of national rates needs stable instruments such as Census and NFHS. Cicourel links ethnomethodology to the making of statistics. Justify: yes for interactional validity; no as a sole reliability design.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.