Revision summary
Ethnicity is a made we-group; Barth emphasised boundaries. Salience grows with migration, elections, media, and honour-resource claims. Primordial feeling and elite organisation both operate. Weberian closure organises labour markets that Marx hoped class would unify. Indian region, caste, language, and lockdown streams illustrate.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethnicity is a we-group of putative common origin, culture, or language, made in interaction. Fredrik Barth stressed boundaries, not a museum of traits. The contemporary world has not melted these boundaries. Migration, democracy, and global markets have made ethnicity more politically salient.
Body
Why salience grows
- Globalisation moves people and goods while threatening local honour. Ethnicity becomes a portable identity, as Giddens’s late-modern self seeks a firm we.
- The nation-state promises civic equality and often delivers ranked citizenship. Ethnic mobilisation is a claim to recognition and resources.
- Clifford Geertz’s primordial attachments still matter in kinship and ritual. Paul Brass and instrumentalists show elites organising those attachments for party and job.
- Durkheimian effervescence in festivals and rallies turns a category into a crowd.
Forms
- Language, region, caste-as-ethnicity, tribe, and religion-as-ethnicity overlap in India.
- Diasporas and labour migrants carry ethnicity into new cities. Lockdown reverse migration also sent ethnic-regional streams home together.
- New media scale insult and solidarity faster than the old neighbourhood.
Against the old script
- Marx expected class to overtake status. Ethnic closure, in Weber’s sense, often organises the labour market instead.
- Parsons’s universalism under-predicted ethnic parties and reservations politics.
- Dependency and world-system inequalities give ethnic peripheries a material grievance, not only a song.
Risks and uses
- Salience can protect minorities and languages. It can also become exclusionary nationalism and urban riot.
- Policy that only sees class misses who is hired on the site; policy that only sees ethnicity misses class inside the group.
Explanation stated
- Salience grows because modernity multiplies contact, inequality, and political arenas in which origin-groups can be named and funded.
- It is constructed and consequential, not a return of the tribe unchanged.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MOD[Migration democracy media] --> SAL[Growing salience] BND[Barth boundaries] --> ETH[Ethnicity] RES[Resources honour jobs] --> SAL ETH --> SAL CLASS[Class] --> MIX[Intertwined not replaced]
Conclusion
Ethnicity is more salient because boundaries are politically useful in markets, migrations, and elections. Barth, Weber, Geertz, and Brass explain how groups are made and mobilised. Indian language, caste, and regional streams, including lockdown returns, are living cases. Class does not replace ethnicity; the two organise each other.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q1(a)). View answer →
-
Is ethnicity the same as race?
Related as ascribed we-groups. Race often biologises hierarchy; ethnicity often stresses culture and origin. In practice they intertwine.
-
Does urban life dissolve ethnicity?
It can thin everyday mixing and still thicken voting, marriage, and hiring by origin.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Europe was the first and the only place where modernity emerged. Comment -
2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think ethnomethodology helps us in getting reliable and valid data ? Justify your answer -
2021 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges involved in collecting data through census method -
2021 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
From the viewpoint of growing importance of multidisciplinarity, how do you relate sociology to other social sciences ? -
2021 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How far are sociologists justified in using positivist approach to understand social reality ? Explain with suitable illustrations -
2021 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How is sociology related to common sense ? -
2021 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you agree with Max Weber's idea that bureaucracy has the potential to become an iron cage ? Justify your answer -
2021 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the relevance of Vilfredo Pareto's theory of Circulation of Elites in the present scenario
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.