Q5(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5(b) Q5(d) →

Critically compare the views of E.B. Tylor and Max Muller on Religion

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Tylor: religion begins as animism, belief in spiritual beings from dreams and death. Müller: gods begin as linguistic personifications of natural forces, especially in the Veda. Both are intellectualist. Durkheim relocates the sacred in the group. Use them as a contrast pair, not as the last word.

Model answer

Introduction

E. B. Tylor and Max Müller both gave intellectualist accounts of religion’s origin. They disagreed on the first idea. Tylor started from the soul in dreams and death. Müller started from language and the naming of natural powers.

Body

Tylor: animism

  • In Primitive Culture, religion is belief in spiritual beings.
  • Dreams, trance, and death suggest a soul; the idea is extended to animals, plants, and the world.
  • Survivals carry old belief into later stages. Evolution is from animism toward more abstract theism.

Müller: nature and speech

  • Comparative philology of the Veda: gods arise as names of sun, dawn, and sky that language later personifies.
  • Myth is a disease of language: forgotten metaphors become stories of beings.
  • India and Indo-European comparison, not only a tribal isolate, are his archive.

Shared limit and Durkheim’s cut

  • Both treat the first worshipper as a puzzled philosopher. Emile Durkheim answered that the sacred is social assembly, not a mistaken inference.
  • Neither theorised church, caste priesthood, or gendered cult as power.

Comparison stated

  • Origin: soul (Tylor) versus spoken nature-names (Müller).
  • Method: ethnological survivals versus philology.
  • Both remain useful as history of ideas, not as adequate sociologies of religion.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  TYL[Tylor animism soul] --> INT[Intellectualist origin]
  MUL[Muller language nature gods] --> INT
  DUR[Durkheim sacred social] --> CRIT[Critique of both]

Conclusion

Tylor’s animism and Müller’s nature-mythology are two intellectualist origins. They differ on soul versus language. Durkheim’s social sacred, and later Weberian meaning, overtake both as sociology, while the two still mark the Victorian debate.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • What is cult ? Explain the growth of cults in the contemporary world

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q5(d)). View answer →

  • Did Müller study only India?

    India and Indo-European philology were central. The claim was about language and nature more widely.

  • Is animism still used?

    As Tylor’s evolutionary first stage, it is dated. As a label for spirit cosmologies, ethnography still uses it with care.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Europe was the first and the only place where modernity emerged. Comment

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Do you think ethnomethodology helps us in getting reliable and valid data ? Justify your answer

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the challenges involved in collecting data through census method

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    From the viewpoint of growing importance of multidisciplinarity, how do you relate sociology to other social sciences ?

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How far are sociologists justified in using positivist approach to understand social reality ? Explain with suitable illustrations

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    How is sociology related to common sense ?

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Do you agree with Max Weber's idea that bureaucracy has the potential to become an iron cage ? Justify your answer

    View answer →

  8. 2021 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Critically examine the relevance of Vilfredo Pareto's theory of Circulation of Elites in the present scenario

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations

Sociology

Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015

Sociology

Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer

Sociology

Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.