Revision summary
Capitalism cheapens labour by expanding uncovered, insecure work. Marx’s reserve army and subcontracting are the mechanisms. Hart and Breman refute the leftover story. Women’s home-based work and gig apps show the present. PLFS: a small regular core, a large informal majority. Increasing: flexibility as competitive strategy, not only persistence of farms.
Model answer
Introduction
Capitalism did not only build the formal factory. It also produces insecure, uncovered work as a flexible shell around the core. Informalisation is increasing where contracts thin, chains lengthen, and platforms rent labour without employing it. The claim can be substantiated.
Body
Why capitalism informalises
- Karl Marx’s reserve army and the need to cheapen labour explain expulsion from the protected core.
- Profit seeks to shed social security. Subcontracting and piece-rates push risk down the chain, which world-system writers after A. G. Frank also mapped globally.
- Max Weber’s formal organisation exists; capital uses it for some and denies it to others.
Historical substantiation
- Keith Hart named the informal sector; Jan Breman showed Indian circular migrants as the normal capitalist labour process, not a pre-modern leftover.
- Deindustrialisation in the North replaced mill jobs with casual services. Daniel Bell’s post-industrial hope missed this.
- Export garment and electronics chains rest on home-based and workshop labour, much of it women, as feminist labour studies show.
Indian and platform evidence
- PLFS and Census class-of-worker data show a large self-employed and casual majority beside a small regular-wage sliver.
- Gig apps present a fetish of self-employment while controlling time and rating, a Marxist appearance with a Weberian digital cage.
- SEWA’s constituency grew because the form grew.
Increasing, not only persistent
- Formalisation drives can coexist with new informal layers: contractors inside “formal” firms.
- Global competition after liberalisation rewarded flexibility more than the standard employment relation.
Qualification
- Some sectors still formalise. The trend the question names is the expanding insecure shell, not the death of every factory Act.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CAP[Capitalist accumulation] --> FLEX[Shed security] FLEX --> INF[Informalisation] CHAIN[Global subcontract] --> INF GIG[Platforms] --> INF CORE[Formal core] --> FLEX
Conclusion
Capitalism increases informalisation by using uncovered labour as a cheap, flexible condition of accumulation. Marx, Hart, Breman, and feminist home-work studies substantiate the mechanism. Indian PLFS and gig platforms substantiate the present. The factory was never the whole of capitalist work; it is less of it now.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically Analyse Durkheim's views on elementary forms of religious life and role of religion Also discuss the consequences of religious revivalism in contemporary society.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is informalisation the same as poverty?
Many informal workers are poor. Some traders are not. The mark is insecurity of contract and cover.
-
Did the welfare state end this in the West?
It compressed it for a time in some cores. Casual services and migrants reopened the shell.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views. -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions. -
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change? -
2020 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the impact of gender division of labour on the development of society? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.