Revision summary
Affirmative action uses group criteria to repair unequal starting lines. Rawls, Sen, and Ambedkar supply justice arguments. Critics allege reverse discrimination; radicals call it too thin. Indian reservation and US admissions are the cases. Bourdieu: merit already hides cultural capital.
Model answer
Introduction
Affirmative action is a public correction of historical exclusion by using group criteria in education, jobs, or contracts. It treats equal treatment as inadequate when starting lines differ. India names much of this as reservation.
Body
The idea
- Formal equality ignores accumulated caste, race, and gender disadvantage. John Rawls’s difference principle is a cousin: inequalities must help the least advantaged.
- Amartya Sen’s capability approach asks whether people can actually convert a right into a functioning.
Theoretical positions
- Liberal compensatory: repair past discrimination, then return to colour- or caste-blind rules. Time-bound reservations argue this.
- Social justice and representation: B. R. Ambedkar treated political and educational safeguards as ongoing against a graded inequality.
- Critique from the right: reverse discrimination and efficiency loss, a Davis–Moore style talent worry.
- Radical critique: without land and capital reform, seats in a college are a thin patch.
Examples
- Indian reservations in legislatures, public jobs, and higher education.
- United States affirmative action in university admissions, later constrained by courts.
- Gender quotas on some panchayats show descriptive representation without an automatic end to unpaid care.
Substantiation
- Bourdieu explains why “merit” already encodes cultural capital. Affirmative action names that bias.
- Exclusion in higher education, as Census graduate gaps show, is the empirical warrant.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EXC[Historical exclusion] --> AA[Affirmative action] AA --> SEAT[Seats jobs contracts] MER[Formal merit] --> BLIND[Blind rules] AA --> JUST[Corrected chances]
Conclusion
Affirmative action is structured preference to equalise chances after group exclusion. Rawls, Sen, and Ambedkar support it as justice; merit-only critics deny the group cut. Indian reservation is the large example. It is necessary and incomplete without wider redistribution.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What is 'informal labour' ? Discuss the need for and challenges in regulating informal labour in the post-industrial society
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is affirmative action the same as welfare?
Welfare transfers resources. Affirmative action reallocates scarce positions of voice and credential.
-
Does it freeze identities?
It uses the categories that already organised exclusion. The long aim is still equal capability.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.