Revision summary
Karve: North Indian kinship stresses exogamy, hypergamy, and natal distance of the bride. South Indian Dravidian type prefers cross-cousin marriage and closer daughter ties. Kin terms encode who may marry. Dumont’s alliance theory neighbours this contrast. NFHS consanguinity still traces the southern pattern in parts.
Model answer
Introduction
Irawati Karve mapped Indian kinship by region, language, and marriage rule. North and South are types, not watertight boxes. The major differences sit in descent emphasis, marriage among kin, and the shape of the bride’s tie to her natal home.
Body
North Indian type
- Preferential marriage is outside a wide circle of kin. Village exogamy is common in many northern belts.
- The bride is absorbed into the husband’s patriline. Natal ties are thinned by distance and hypergamy.
- Gotra and clan bans stretch far. Kinship language marks wife-givers and wife-takers as unequal.
South Indian type
- Dravidian kinship, as Karve read it, allows and often prefers cross-cousin marriage.
- The woman remains a daughter in a closer kin field. Exchange repeats across generations.
- Terminology classifies cross and parallel kin differently, which organises who is a spouse.
Why it matters
- Louis Dumont also stressed alliance in the south. Karve tied the contrast to culture regions, not only to a Brahmanical text.
- Census marriage tables and later NFHS on consanguinity still echo the southern preference in some states.
- Neither type is “more modern”. Both organise property and care.
Caution
- East, west, and tribal systems, and urban mixing, sit outside a blunt north–south binary.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Karve] --> N[North wide exogamy] K --> S[South cross-cousin] N --> BR[Bride absorbed] S --> ALL[Repeated alliance]
Conclusion
For Karve, the North emphasises wide exogamy and a sharp transfer of the bride; the South emphasises cross-cousin alliance and closer natal continuity. Terminology, village rule, and hypergamy versus repeated exchange are the major differences.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Differentiate between 'Life-chances' and 'Life-style' with suitable examples
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did Karve say all north is one system?
She used a regional type. Local jati rules vary.
-
Has urban India erased the contrast?
It has mixed practice. Endogamy and cousin rules still appear in NFHS and marriage ads.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.