Revision summary
Terrorism offsets military inequality with civilian spectacle and hiding. It targets the state’s monopoly of force and a watching public. Newness: networks, media, transnational reach. War-on-terror challenges: no capital, recruitment via repression, emergency law. The metaphor of winning a war fits states better than cells.
Model answer
Introduction
Asymmetrical warfare is conflict between unequal military capacities. Terrorism uses spectacular violence against civilians and symbols to offset that inequality. It is “new” in global media reach and networked cells, not in the fact of irregular fear.
Body
Asymmetry
- Regular armies hold territory and uniforms. Terrorist groups hold timing, hiding, and the news image.
- Max Weber’s state monopoly of legitimate force is the target. The attack seeks a political audience, as Charles Tilly’s violence-as-politics reminds us.
- Newness: transnational finance, encrypted media, and cities as stages, after 9/11 as a world event.
Challenges of a “war on terrorism”
- The enemy is a network, not a capital to occupy. Michels-style organisation can be cellular.
- Winning hearts sits against profiling that produces labelling and new recruits, a Mertonian unanticipated consequence.
- Democracies risk emergency laws that thin civil society, which Gramsci would read as coercive substitution for hegemony.
- Distinguishing insurgency, communal riot, and terrorism is a political act, not a clean file.
Limit of the war metaphor
- Wars end with surrender. Terror campaigns can pause, split, and rename.
- Development, honour, and foreign policy sit outside a purely military win.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[State army] --> ASYM[Asymmetry] TER[Terror network] --> ASYM MED[Media spectacle] --> TER WAR[War metaphor] --> CH[No capital to take]
Conclusion
Terrorism is asymmetrical because the weak use civilian spectacle against the strong state’s monopoly of force. Media and networks make the form newly global. Winning a war on terrorism is challenged by cells without capitals, by recruitment through repression, and by the mismatch of war language with a political-network problem.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is all irregular war terrorism?
No. Guerrilla war may target armies. Terrorism’s mark is the civilian-symbolic strike for an audience.
-
Can development end it?
Grievance matters. Organisation and ideology also matter. Neither bombs nor jobs alone close the file.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.