Revision summary
Pareto: history as circulation of elites, lions and foxes. Mosca and Michels add ruling class and oligarchy. Mills: circulation may stay inside institutional directorates. Marx expected class abolition; Pareto expected a new minority. Gender and property limit who circulates.
Model answer
Introduction
Vilfredo Pareto argued that history is the circulation of elites, not the end of rule by a minority. Lions and foxes, residues of combination and persistence, replace one another. The concept is about organised minorities, not about the disappearance of class.
Body
The concept
- Gaetano Mosca’s ruling class and Robert Michels’s iron law of oligarchy neighbour Pareto.
- Circulation can be slow infiltration or sudden replacement after decay and violence.
- Elites are those who excel in the valued capacities of the time: force, cunning, wealth, or votes.
Sociological use
- C. Wright Mills asked whether American directorates circulate among themselves rather than with the public.
- Indian political families, IAS-corporate doors, and caste associations show circulation inside a thin layer.
- Karl Marx expected class overthrow. Pareto expected a new elite with a new ideology.
Limits
- Psychological residues underplay property and gender. Sylvia Walby’s structures are not a fox’s trick.
- Democracy can widen recruitment without ending minority rule, which is Michels’s sting.
- Census occupational tops are not a full elite map; parties and honour matter, as Max Weber said.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MASS[Mass] --> EL[Organised minority] EL --> CIR[Circulation] CIR --> NEW[New elite] DEC[Decay force cunning] --> CIR
Conclusion
Circulation of elites names the replacement of one organised minority by another. Pareto, Mosca, and Michels are the core. It warns against a simple mass age. It fails if it ignores class, caste, and gender as the soil of who can even enter the circle.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
In the light of judicial intervention on 'Live-in relationships', discuss the future of marriage and family in India
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does circulation mean social mobility for all?
No. It means turnover at the top. The mass may stay a mass.
-
Is every cabinet change circulation?
Only if the minority’s composition and skills actually change, not if the same families rotate chairs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline
Sociology
Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss
Stratification and Mobility: Concepts
Davis and Moore: unequal rewards fill important roles; the device is unconscious. Tumin: importance is politically defined. Marx and Weber add exploitation, status, and party. Caste and gender close talent before sorting begins. Use the thesis for incentives; do not use it as a full theory of inequality.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?
Sociology
Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.