Revision summary
Durkheim: anomie as weak regulation and unbounded desire, seen in suicide and rapid differentiation. Merton: anomie as strain between cultural success and class-rationed means. Adaptations include innovation and ritualism. Indian exams often fit Merton; market crashes can still fit Durkheim. They share a normative vocabulary, not the same mechanism.
Model answer
Introduction
Both use anomie for a mismatch in the normative order. Emile Durkheim meant weak regulation of passions and goals. Robert K. Merton meant a strain between culturally prescribed success and unequal legitimate means. The difference is regulation versus structured opportunity.
Body
Durkheim’s anomie
- In The Division of Labour, anomie is insufficient moral regulation when differentiation is too fast.
- In Suicide, anomic suicide follows boom, crash, or marital shock: goals become unbounded.
- The problem is a missing ceiling on desire, a social fact of deregulation.
Merton’s anomie
- In Social Structure and Anomie, American culture stresses money success for all.
- The class structure rations education and jobs.
- Innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion are adaptations, with conformity as the fifth.
- Crime as innovation is a sociological, not a biological, outcome.
The difference
- Durkheim: collapse or weakness of rules that limit goals.
- Merton: rules of success stay strong while means are blocked; strain is built into stratification.
- Durkheim worries about boundless desire. Merton worries about a bound success ethic plus unequal doors.
- Indian exam and informal-labour worlds often look Mertonian: huge success talk, narrow formal means. Agrarian price shock can still look Durkheimian.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Durkheim] --> REG[Weak regulation unbounded goals] M[Merton] --> STR[Success goals blocked means] STR --> AD[Five adaptations] REG --> SUI[Anomic suicide]
Conclusion
Durkheim’s anomie is deregulation of goals. Merton’s is strain between universal success goals and unequal means. Use Durkheim for shocks that lift the ceiling; use Merton for a stable culture of success inside a closed opportunity structure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this?
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is Merton only about crime?
Crime is one illustration. Ritualist clerks and retreatists are also anomic adaptations.
-
Can both apply at once?
Yes. A success culture can sit inside a shock that also lifts regulation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain Durkheim's basic arguments on suicide. Can you analyse high suicide rates of contemporary Indian society with Durkheim's theory? -
2018 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Evaluate if social stratification is functional for society. -
2018 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Schooling does not ensure upward mobility of all members of this society. Discuss with reference in class societies. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How can Parsons' AGIL framework be used to analyse key problems is a society? Discuss. -
2018 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is labour commitment? Discuss it with reference to studies of manufacturing industry. -
2018 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp SOCIOLOGY and biography and the relationship between the two in society." - C.W.Mills . Explain. -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
In what way did Durkheim perceive religion as functional to society?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.