Revision summary
Exploratory design maps unclear fields with flexible qualitative tools. Explanatory design tests named relations with comparison and controls. Durkheim’s suicide is explanatory; a first gig ethnography is exploratory. They often sequence; mixing is legitimate. Do not sell a case as a national explanation.
Model answer
Introduction
Research design is the plan that links question to evidence. Exploratory design maps an unclear field. Explanatory design tests a stated relation. Both are scientific when their claims match their reach.
Body
Exploratory design
- Used when concepts are weak or the population is hidden.
- Tools: unstructured interview, participant observation, pilot survey, theoretical sampling after Glaser and Strauss.
- Example: first mapping of gig riders’ unpaid waiting time, or of a new sect’s household practice.
- Output: types, hypotheses, and better indicators, not a national rate.
Explanatory design
- Used when a relation is named: an independent and a dependent variable, with controls.
- Tools: comparative tables in Durkheim’s suicide, multivariate survey models, historical comparison.
- Example: does female education associate with lower fertility in NFHS after controlling wealth? Does contractor use raise injury in a mill sample?
- Max Weber still wants meaning-adequacy inside explanation.
How they sequence
- Exploration often precedes explanation. Reversing them produces false precision.
- Mixed designs are common: ethnography to interpret a Census pattern.
Indian caution
- An exploratory village case cannot “explain India”. An explanatory NFHS model cannot “understand” a ritual without further meaning work.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EXPL[Exploratory] --> MAP[Types hypotheses] MAP --> EXPLN[Explanatory test] EXPLN --> REL[Stated relation] MIX[Ethnography plus survey] --> BOTH[Fuller claim]
Conclusion
Exploratory design discovers the map. Explanatory design tests a relation. Gig ethnography and Durkheimian or NFHS comparisons illustrate the pair. Match the design to the question’s maturity.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How can Parsons' AGIL framework be used to analyse key problems is a society? Discuss.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is exploratory research unscientific?
It is unscientific if sold as a finished causal law. It is scientific as a designed first map.
-
Must explanation be statistical?
No. Historical comparison can explain. It must still specify a relation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense? -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work -
2018 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Does the collapse of functionalism and bankruptcy of Marxism coincide with the rupture of modernity? Discuss. -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations? -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this? -
2018 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is the theory of cultural lag valid in present times? Discuss -
2018 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What, according to Pareto, are the basic characteristics of elites? Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.