Q7(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q2(c) Q2(c) →

Problematize the concept if secularism in the present context

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Secularism is a family of settlements, not one wall. Indian practice leaned toward equal respect and principled distance, with unfinished personal-law reform. Revival and majoritarian politics problematise neutrality. Weber’s full disenchantment did not arrive. Specify which secularism rather than treat the word as self-explaining.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

  • Secularism names a settlement between state and faith: distance, equal respect, or privatisation of belief. In the present it is a problem because those meanings clash, and because religious publics have not quietly gone home.

Body

Competing meanings

  • Western privatisation of religion versus Indian sarva dharma sambhava as principled distance with reform of personal law still unfinished.
  • Rajeev Bhargava’s contextual secularism tries to hold principled distance without a wall.

Present problems

  • Religious revival and majoritarian politics test the neutrality of the state.
  • Personal laws, uniform civil code debates, and Census religion tables keep faith public.
  • Max Weber’s secularisation as disenchantment never fully arrived; Durkheim expected new cults, including the nation.

What problematising is not

  • It is not a call to abandon equal citizenship.
  • It is a call to specify which secularism, whose injury, and which public ritual the state blesses.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SEC[Secularism] --> P[Privatisation]
  SEC --> D[Principled distance]
  REV[Revival majoritarianism] --> TEST[Tests the state]
  D --> CIT[Equal citizenship]

Conclusion

Secularism is problematic today because it is several doctrines at once, and because religion remains a public power. The live task is equal citizenship under principled distance, not a pretend emptying of the sacred.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Is sociology common sense? Give reasons in support of your argument.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q2(c)). View answer →

  • Does problematising secularism mean giving it up?

    No. It means arguing which arrangement protects minorities and civic peace.

  • Is the nation a secular religion?

    Durkheimian civil religion can sit beside faiths and also threaten them.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2026 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain the concept of "definition of the situation" and its significance in sociology.

    View answer →

  2. 2026 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    In what way can the concept of 'patriarchal bargain' be applied to the institution of marriage? Comment.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the concept of animism and differentiate it from naturism

    View answer →

  4. 2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the concept of circulation of elite

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the significance and limitations of 'intersectionality' in social research

Sociology

Intersectionality, coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, examines how overlapping identities like race, class, and gender shape systemic oppression. Its significance in social research lies in capturing lived realities beyond single-axis frameworks and preventing reductive generalisations. However, limitations include methodological complexity, risks of infinite regress, and difficulties in operationalising fluid categories. Effective application requires balancing structural macro-analysis with micro-level lived experiences.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Discuss the intellectual origins of sociology and its evolution as a distinct field of study

Sociology

Sociology arose in 19th-century Western Europe to make sense of massive upheavals caused by the Industrial and French Revolutions. Enlightenment thinkers laid the groundwork by championing reason, empirical observation, and human agency over traditional dogma. Auguste Comte gave the discipline its name, pushing for a positivist "physics of society" based on scientific laws. Émile Durkheim secured its academic legitimacy by defining "social facts" and using empirical methods to study human behavior. Max Weber introduced interpretive sociology, while Karl Marx focused on material conditions and class struggle. In the 20th century, Talcott Parsons advanced structural-functionalism to study systemic equilibrium. Later, conflict theories, the Frankfurt School, and postmodern critiques broadened the field to address power and marginalisation. Today, sociology continues to evolve by analyzing globalisation, digital shifts, and modern identity politics.

PDF