Revision summary
Durkheim: sacred and profane as the basic religious classification. The sacred is society’s force in ritual and church. Festivals and civil religion still fit. Weber, Marx, and gender show meaning and domination the split misses. Lived religion often leaks across the border.
Model answer
Introduction
Emile Durkheim treated the sacred and the profane as the elementary classification of religious life. The sacred is set apart and forbidden; the profane is ordinary practical life. Assessment must keep the power of that split and its limits for salvation religions and inequality.
Body
The notion
- In The Elementary Forms, religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, uniting a church.
- The sacred is society’s ideal force, felt in collective effervescence.
- Taboo and ritual maintain the border.
Assessment, strengths
- It explains ritual solidarity without requiring a particular god.
- National days, stadiums, and Indian public festivals still mark space and time as set apart.
- Robert Bellah’s civil religion is a Durkheimian cousin.
Assessment, limits
- Max Weber stressed theodicy, prophets, and inner-worldly asceticism, which a clan totem model underplays.
- Karl Marx stressed class veil and protest. The “church” is stratified by caste and gender.
- Everyday lived religion mixes kitchen and shrine, so the border is leaky.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religion] --> S[Sacred set apart] REL --> P[Profane ordinary] S --> E[Effervescence church] W[Weber Marx gender] --> LIM[Limits]
Conclusion
The sacred–profane split remains a strong tool for ritual and group ideal. It is a weaker tool for meaning, domination, and porous domestic worship. Use it for solidarity; do not use it as the whole of religion.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine 'patriarchal bargain ' as gendered division of work in contemporary India
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the flag sacred in Durkheim’s sense?
It can be, if set apart by ritual interdicts. It may lack a full church.
-
Did he deny gods?
He explained gods as society represented. He did not study them only as error.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does the institution of marriage continue to be sacred in Indian society? Comments.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
Sociology
Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism
Sociology as Science
Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
Sociology as Science
A variable is a concept with more than one comparable value. It states relations and forces operational definition. Durkheim’s suicide rates illustrate theoretically named variables. Census and NFHS work variables can hide unpaid care if poorly coded. Blumer’s warning is part of the significance, not a footnote.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.