Revision summary
Two theories: evolutionary-functional change and historical materialism. Durkheim and Parsons: differentiation, solidarity, adaptive upgrading. Marx: forces and relations of production, class struggle, modes. Strengths and weaknesses reverse: order versus conflict, stages versus rupture. India mixes Sanskritisation, class, and political reservation.
Model answer
Introduction
Theories of social change try to name what moves a society from one pattern to another. Two usable theories are evolutionary-functional change and historical-materialist change. They disagree on motor, direction, and conflict.
Body
Evolutionary and functional theory
- Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer pictured stages toward complexity and differentiation.
- Emile Durkheim described the shift from mechanical to organic solidarity as division of labour thickens, with anomie as a pathological companion.
- Talcott Parsons treated change as adaptive upgrading of AGIL subsystems: economy, polity, law, and culture.
- Strength: it names differentiation, law, and education as change sites.
- Weakness: it underplays domination and can read history as a one-way modernisation. Dependency theory and caste persistence embarrass a smooth upgrade.
Historical materialism
- Karl Marx located change in contradiction between forces and relations of production, fought out as class struggle.
- Modes of production are historical types. Ideology and state are not first movers.
- Strength: it explains industrial capitalism, primitive accumulation, and why technology arrives inside property.
- Weakness: a mechanical sequence of stages, and a thin account of gender, caste, and status, which Max Weber and later feminists added.
Indian use of the two
- Sanskritisation and Westernisation, after M. N. Srinivas, look like status evolution; land reform and informal labour look like class process.
- Mandal and reservations are political change that neither Spencer nor a thin Marx fully scripts.
Comparison
- Motor: adaptation versus contradiction.
- Direction: differentiation versus possible rupture.
- Agents: system needs versus classes.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EV[Evolutionary functional] --> DIFF[Differentiation AGIL] HM[Historical materialism] --> CL[Class contradiction] DIFF --> IND[Indian mix] CL --> IND ST[Status gender] --> IND
Conclusion
Functional-evolutionary theory explains differentiation and the risk of anomie. Historical materialism explains property, class, and rupture. A full account of Indian change needs both, plus status and gender, which neither classic pair exhausted.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Why only two theories?
The question asks for any two in detail. Weberian rationalisation or cyclic theories could be a third pair.
-
Do the two cancel each other?
They name different motors. Empirical change often shows both differentiation and class conflict.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social change." Explain. -
2016 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
"Social change can be brought about through development." Illustrate. from the contemporary situation of India. -
2016 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary trends in family as a response to social change in modern society. -
2016 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Education is a major source of social mobility in contemporary society." Explain. -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the relevance of the idea of 'cultural lag' in understanding social change.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
Sociology
Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism
Sociology as Science
Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
Sociology as Science
A variable is a concept with more than one comparable value. It states relations and forces operational definition. Durkheim’s suicide rates illustrate theoretically named variables. Census and NFHS work variables can hide unpaid care if poorly coded. Blumer’s warning is part of the significance, not a footnote.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.