Revision summary
Indian kinship varies by region and community, not as one joint-family script. North: patriliny, village exogamy, hypergamy. South: Dravidian cross-cousin alliance within mostly patrilineal groups. Matriliny in Kerala’s past Nayar form and in the Northeast. Karve, Dumont, and Trautmann map the variation that urban migration now stretches.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian kinship is not one script. Descent, marriage, residence, and inheritance vary by region, and by caste and tribe inside regions. Irawati Karve mapped zones. Later work added Dravidian cross-cousin rules, north Indian hypergamy, and matriliny in pockets.
Body
North
- Largely patrilineal, patrilocal, with village exogamy and a wide ban on cousin marriage among many caste Hindus.
- Kanyadan and hypergamy, as Louis Dumont and others discussed, shape honour and dowry pressure.
- Joint family talk is strong even when households split.
South and Dravidian zone
- Thomas Trautmann and Karve noted preferential cross-cousin marriage among many groups, which keeps alliances close.
- Patriliny still dominates, but the marriage map differs from the north Indian gotra-village pattern.
- Property and in-law intimacy follow that closer kin net.
East and west
- Bengal and the east show distinctive lineage and marriage practices among caste groups; tribal belts add clan rules.
- The west, including parts of Rajasthan and Gujarat, mixes north Indian exogamy with strong caste associations.
Matriliny and exceptions
- Kerala’s Nayar taravad, now much transformed, and Meghalaya’s Khasi-Garo matriliny show that patriarchy is not identical with patriliny.
- Himalayan and Himalayan-fringe polyandry in some groups was a demographic-property adaptation.
Caste, tribe, religion
- Kinship varies more by community than by state line. Muslim, Christian, and Parsi personal laws add another layer.
- Urban migration produces translocal kinship: the region travels by phone and marriage market.
Why variation matters
- It organises women’s mobility, dowry versus bride-price residues, and who counts as heir.
- A single “Indian joint family” question hides this map.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD KIN[Indian kinship] --> N[North exogamy hypergamy] KIN --> S[Dravidian cross-cousin] KIN --> M[Matriliny pockets] KIN --> T[Tribe personal law] N --> GEN[Gender property] S --> GEN
Conclusion
Regional kinship in India varies from north Indian village exogamy and hypergamy to Dravidian cross-cousin alliance, with matriliny and tribal clan systems as further types. Karve, Dumont, and Trautmann remain the map-makers. Gendered work and property still follow these maps.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Problematize the concept if secularism in the present context
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is south India less patriarchal because of cross-cousin marriage?
Alliance is closer. Patriarchy of property and honour can still be strong.
-
Do metros erase regional kinship?
They mix partners and still often reproduce regional and caste rules in the marriage market.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically analyse Talcott Parsons conception of pattern variable' -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss distinct sociological method adopted by Emile Durkheim in his study of 'suicide' -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Analyse Marxian conception of historical materialism as a critique of Hegelian dialectics -
2017 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What do you understand by informalisation of labour '? Write your answer with special reference to India -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give an assessment of Durkheimian notion of 'sacred' and 'profane' in sociology of religion -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is new in 'new social movement '? Elaborate your answer with special reference to India -
2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Evaluate Marx's ideas on mode of production -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the functional prerequisites of social system as given by Talcott Parsons. Examined in the context of a university as a social system.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
Sociology
Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism
Sociology as Science
Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
Sociology as Science
A variable is a concept with more than one comparable value. It states relations and forces operational definition. Durkheim’s suicide rates illustrate theoretically named variables. Census and NFHS work variables can hide unpaid care if poorly coded. Blumer’s warning is part of the significance, not a footnote.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.