Q2(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Discuss the changing equation of discipline of sociology with other social sciences

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Sociology began as a claim to the whole of society. Durkheim, Weber, and Marx drew borders with mind, meaning, and production. Mid-century specialisation split the social sciences; Parsons over-unified them. Historical sociology, political sociology, and ethnography reopened traffic. Indian caste, gender, and informal labour force a joint equation, not a sealed discipline.

Model answer

Introduction

Sociology’s equation with economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology has never been a fixed border. It began as a claim to the whole of society. It now works as a complementary science of relations, methods, and inequalities that specialists still need.

Body

The founding claim

  • Auguste Comte placed sociology as queen of the sciences. Emile Durkheim later marked social facts off from psychology.
  • Max Weber shared the interpretative field with history and economics, yet kept social action as the unit.
  • Karl Marx made the economy social, so a sealed economics of price was already a political fiction.

Mid-century specialisation

  • Economics modelled choice. Political science modelled the state. Psychology modelled the mind. Sociology kept survey, class, and role.
  • Talcott Parsons tried a grand system that absorbed neighbouring sciences as subsystems. The attempt overreached.

Later mixing

  • Rational-choice and network work borrowed from economics without surrendering structure.
  • Political sociology, after Stein Rokkan and Indian election studies, treated votes as caste, class, and gender, not only as office.
  • Historical sociology, after Barrington Moore and Theda Skocpol, closed the old split of unique history versus types.
  • Social anthropology and sociology now share ethnography; the Census and NFHS are already joint files.

Indian equation

  • M. N. Srinivas, Andre Beteille, and later Dalit and feminist work made caste and gender objects that economics of growth cannot finish.
  • Informal labour and SHGs sit across economics and sociology. Civil society sits across political science and sociology.

Present equation

  • The useful equation is division of labour plus shared methods.
  • Sociology does not own society. It asks how neighbouring objects hang together as structure and meaning.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SOC[Sociology relations] --> ECO[Economics]
  SOC --> POL[Political science]
  SOC --> PSY[Psychology]
  SOC --> HIS[History]
  SOC --> ANT[Anthropology]
  MIX[Shared methods files] --> SOC

Conclusion

The equation shifted from imperial queen-science to complementary study of relations. Durkheim, Weber, and Marx still mark the classic cuts. Contemporary work mixes methods with economics, politics, history, and anthropology, especially on caste, gender, and informal work in India.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Examine the basic postulates of positivism and post-positivism

    Next question in the 2017 paper (Q2). View answer →

  • Has sociology been absorbed by economics?

    Some tools travelled. Caste, gender, and meaning still require sociological questions.

  • Is anthropology now the same as sociology?

    Methods overlap. Scale, the state, and official surveys still mark a practical difference.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Can we equate 'poverty' with 'poor living' ? Elaborate your answer

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Examine the basic postulates of positivism and post-positivism

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Elaborate the main tenets of interpretative perspective in sociology

    View answer →

  5. 2017 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Problematize the concept if secularism in the present context

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Is sociology common sense? Give reasons in support of your argument.

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    "Participant observation is the most effective tool for collecting facts." Comment.

    View answer →

  8. 2016 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    To what extent is patriarchy a cause for the problems of women? Discuss

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper

Sociology

Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism

Sociology as Science

Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.