Revision summary
Hegel: history as dialectical unfolding of Spirit. Marx keeps process and contradiction, inverts the subject to material production. Base, superstructure, and class struggle replace the Idea as first mover. Appearance and commodity fetishism continue a critical dialectic. Stages must not be read as a mechanical timetable.
Model answer
Introduction
G. W. F. Hegel’s dialectic treated history as the unfolding of Spirit through contradiction. Karl Marx kept contradiction and process, and inverted the subject: material production and class, not the Idea, move history. Historical materialism is that inversion as a research programme.
Body
Hegelian dialectics, briefly
- Reality is rational process. Thesis and antithesis are aufgehoben, preserved and cancelled, in a higher synthesis.
- The state and philosophy appear as moments of Spirit’s self-knowledge.
- Ludwig Feuerbach had already criticised religion as projected essence; Marx pushed the critique into labour and class.
Marx’s inversion
- In the German Ideology and the 1859 Preface, being determines consciousness, not the reverse as a first cause.
- Forces and relations of production form a base. Legal and political superstructure, and forms of consciousness, arise on it, with feedback.
- Class struggle is the motor. Modes of production, from ancient to feudal to capitalist, are historical types, not Spirit’s costumes.
What is kept from Hegel
- Totality, contradiction, and history as process, against a static pile of facts.
- Critique of appearance: the commodity form hides social relations, as Marx showed in Capital.
What is refused
- The Idea as subject. Workers and owners in a definite labour process are the subjects.
- A merely philosophical resolution of contradiction. Emancipation is practical, through transformation of production.
Later use and caution
- Engels’s popular summaries sometimes looked like a mechanical sequence. Marx’s own analyses of 1848 and of India were more conjunctural.
- Max Weber criticised monocausal economic explanation. The critique of Hegel still stands as a turn to material life.
- Indian agrarian class and informal labour can be read with this toolkit without waiting for a textbook sequence of stages.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD HEG[Hegel Spirit dialectic] --> INV[Marx inversion] INV --> BASE[Forces and relations of production] BASE --> CL[Class struggle] CL --> HIST[Modes of production] IDEA[Idea as subject] --> REJ[Rejected]
Conclusion
Historical materialism criticises Hegel by standing the dialectic on material production and class. Contradiction remains; Spirit does not. The programme is a history of labour and property, not a hymn to the Idea.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine epistemological foundation of qualitative methods of social research
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Did Marx simply reject Hegel?
He rejected the Idealist subject. He kept dialectical history and critique of appearance.
-
Is the superstructure a mere shadow?
Marx allowed law and politics to react. He denied they are the first cause of epochal change.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically analyse Talcott Parsons conception of pattern variable' -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss distinct sociological method adopted by Emile Durkheim in his study of 'suicide' -
2017 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What do you understand by informalisation of labour '? Write your answer with special reference to India -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give an assessment of Durkheimian notion of 'sacred' and 'profane' in sociology of religion -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is new in 'new social movement '? Elaborate your answer with special reference to India -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the regional variations of kinship system in Indian society -
2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Evaluate Marx's ideas on mode of production -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the functional prerequisites of social system as given by Talcott Parsons. Examined in the context of a university as a social system.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
Sociology
Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism
Sociology as Science
Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
Sociology as Science
A variable is a concept with more than one comparable value. It states relations and forces operational definition. Durkheim’s suicide rates illustrate theoretically named variables. Census and NFHS work variables can hide unpaid care if poorly coded. Blumer’s warning is part of the significance, not a footnote.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.