Revision summary
Closed systems still leak persons and group styles. Marx: class places can hold while individuals circulate. Srinivas: Sanskritisation may leave hierarchy standing. Structural change needs new rules of property, office, or honour. Comment: do not equate vertical mobility with a new system.
Model answer
Introduction
Vertical mobility is movement up or down a ranked order. A closed system ascribes rank by birth. The statement claims that even there, rises and falls change the structure. Comment: some mobility changes persons; structural change needs a shift in the rules of closure.
Body
Closed systems and leak
- Caste and estate approximate closure. Pitirim Sorokin still found some vertical movement.
- M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is group mobility of style. The ranked structure can remain.
When mobility is not structural change
- Karl Marx: circulation of persons can leave class places intact. A few rise; the proletariat remains.
- Max Weber’s status honour can absorb new wealth without opening marriage.
When it does bite the structure
- Repeated group mobility plus political power, as in Mandal-era office holding, can rewrite legitimate domination in Weber’s sense.
- Demographic saturation of a rank, or a new mode of production, changes the system, not only the names in it.
- Gendered glass ceilings show that some vertical moves never arrive; that too is structure.
Comment
- The statement overstates “even”. Mobility is a solvent only when rules of ascription, property, or office change.
- Treat person-move and structure-move as two measures.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD VM[Vertical mobility] --> PER[Persons move] VM --> STY[Sanskritisation style] RULE[Rules of closure change] --> STR[Structural change] PER --> NOT[Not automatically structure]
Conclusion
Vertical mobility in a closed system is often a leak or a style shift, not a new structure. Marx, Weber, and Srinivas warn against confusing biographies with the hierarchy. Structural change needs altered rules of closure, not only a few successful lives.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Is any promotion structural change?
No. It is a biography unless the channels and closures of the system shift.
-
Can a closed system survive much mobility?
Yes, if endogamy, property, and honour rules still sort the next generation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions -
2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In social mobility possible in closed systems of stratification ? Illustrate from research work. -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is Weberian critique of Marxist notion of social stratification -
2017 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine gender. Ethnicity and race as major dimensions of social stratification -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society. -
2016 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the relationship between poverty and social exclusion -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"No society can either be completely open or completely closed." comment. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Differentiate between Maxian and Weberian theories of Social stratification.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss
Religion and Society
Sociology emerged to explain industrial, political, and secular modern order. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Mead, and Parsons mapped that object. Comparison with other types is a method, not a betrayal. Colonial India is inside modernity’s history, not outside sociology. Discuss: pre-eminently modern, not exclusively the contemporary West.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Sociology as Science
Value-free sociology is Weber’s split: values choose questions; proof stays disciplined. It is not Comte’s moral church, not Marx’s fusion of theory and practice, not a view from nowhere. Durkheim’s files, Mead’s interaction, and Harding’s standpoint show the strain. Clarify: a rule of demonstration, not a ban on moral topics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research
Research Methods and Analysis
Qualitative methods recover meaning, process, and context. Weber, Mead, Blumer, Geertz, and Merton justify that object. They reach hidden groups and latent functions that tables miss. They still need triangulation and comparison. Importance is complementarity with Census and survey magnitudes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.