Revision summary
Development can rewrite production, welfare, and everyday roles. India: growth, schemes, SHGs, digital state, NFHS fertility and schooling. Marx, Parsons, and Mead explain structural and self change. Weber, Durkheim, and Merton explain surviving status, anomie, and latent inequality. Illustration: real change, not automatic equality.
Model answer
Introduction
Development is planned improvement of production, welfare, and capabilities, usually by the state and market. It can bring social change. In contemporary India it also reproduces caste, class, and gender unless those are named as targets.
Body
How development changes society
- Karl Marx: a shift in productive forces and relations is social change, whether called development or accumulation.
- Talcott Parsons: differentiation of economy, school, and law is a developmental path.
- Education, health, and infrastructure rewrite everyday time, mobility, and the self, in George Herbert Mead’s sense of new generalised others.
Contemporary Indian illustrations
- Liberalisation and growth expanded a consumer middle class and urban work, a class change.
- Rural roads, MGNREGA, and mobiles changed women’s public presence in some regions, still constrained by patriarchy.
- SHGs and microcredit made women visible as economic actors, with mixed control over funds.
- Digital payments and Aadhaar reorganised the state’s reach, a Weberian intensification of files.
- NFHS shows fertility decline and schooling gains: demographic and gender change tied to development services.
Limits of the slogan
- Development without land and labour rights can be dispossession, which Marx would not call emancipation.
- Caste remains in hiring and marriage despite GDP. Max Weber’s status outlasts income.
- Emile Durkheim’s anomie appears in boom cities: more division of labour, weaker regulation.
- Robert K. Merton: manifest growth, latent inequality and cultural lag in Ogburn’s sense.
- Environmental harm and informal work show change that is not simply “up”.
Illustration judged
- Yes, development has brought occupational, demographic, and state-capacity change in India.
- It is not an automatic solvent of hierarchy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DEV[Development] --> CH[Occupational demographic state change] DEV --> INEQ[Latent inequality] IND[India growth schemes NFHS] --> CH CASTE[Caste gender land] --> INEQ
Conclusion
Development can bring social change, and contemporary India shows that in work, fertility, schooling, and state files. Marx, Parsons, Weber, and Durkheim warn that growth, differentiation, and anomie travel together. Illustrate with gains and with persistent caste–gender closure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is GDP growth the same as social change?
It can fund change. Without shifts in relations of caste, gender, and labour it is a narrow economic fact.
-
Can movements bring change without development?
Yes. Law and honour can shift through conflict. Development is one path, not the only one.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine any two theories of social change in detail society -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social change." Explain. -
2016 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary trends in family as a response to social change in modern society. -
2016 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Education is a major source of social mobility in contemporary society." Explain. -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the relevance of the idea of 'cultural lag' in understanding social change.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss
Religion and Society
Sociology emerged to explain industrial, political, and secular modern order. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Mead, and Parsons mapped that object. Comparison with other types is a method, not a betrayal. Colonial India is inside modernity’s history, not outside sociology. Discuss: pre-eminently modern, not exclusively the contemporary West.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Sociology as Science
Value-free sociology is Weber’s split: values choose questions; proof stays disciplined. It is not Comte’s moral church, not Marx’s fusion of theory and practice, not a view from nowhere. Durkheim’s files, Mead’s interaction, and Harding’s standpoint show the strain. Clarify: a rule of demonstration, not a ban on moral topics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research
Research Methods and Analysis
Qualitative methods recover meaning, process, and context. Weber, Mead, Blumer, Geertz, and Merton justify that object. They reach hidden groups and latent functions that tables miss. They still need triangulation and comparison. Importance is complementarity with Census and survey magnitudes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.