Revision summary
Fundamentalism is modern organised purity, not timeless faith. Religion matters as text, sect, charisma, and moral community. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim explain resources and meanings, not a simple piety motor. Parties, media, and failed secular promises organise the increase. Answer: important role as idiom; not a sufficient cause.
Model answer
Introduction
Fundamentalism is a modern organised claim to restore a pure, inerrant foundation against pluralism. Religion supplies symbols and congregations. It is not a sufficient cause. Politics, media, and insecurity organise the increase.
Body
Reasons to say yes, religion matters
- Sacred texts and the church as moral community, in Emile Durkheim’s sense, can be tightened into an exclusive we.
- Max Weber’s virtuoso and sect types train high-demand certainty; charisma can fuse with scripture.
- Meaning and theodicy, which Weber stressed, become political programmes when the world looks unjust.
Reasons not to blame “religion” as such
- Karl Marx: religion is protest and veil; the increase often tracks class and nation, not piety alone.
- Secularisation’s incompleteness and the secular state’s failures feed reactive faith, which Bryan Wilson’s decline thesis did not fully predict.
- Media markets and parties instrumentalise faith. That is organisation, which Robert K. Merton would split into manifest piety and latent power.
- Indian public religion long coexisted with pluralism; the increase of fundamentalism is a political-historical shift, not a sudden birth of belief.
Answer
- Religion is an important resource and idiom of fundamentalism.
- The increase is explained by modern organisation of certainty, not by the mere existence of temples or churches.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religious symbols church] --> FUND[Fundamentalism] POL[Parties media insecurity] --> FUND REL --> RES[Resource not sole cause]
Conclusion
Yes, religion plays an important role as sacred resource, sect discipline, and moral community. No, it is not an autonomous engine of the increase. Weber, Durkheim, and Marx together locate fundamentalism in modern politics using religious materials.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
To what extent is patriarchy a cause for the problems of women? Discuss
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Are all devout people fundamentalists?
No. Everyday practice and inclusive churches differ from organised inerrant politics.
-
Does secularisation end fundamentalism?
Incomplete secularisation and political use of faith can intensify it.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give your comments on the growth of religious revivalism in the present day context -
2020 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically Analyse Durkheim's views on elementary forms of religious life and role of religion Also discuss the consequences of religious revivalism in contemporary society. -
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
State the reasons for the various religious beliefs and practices in pre-modern societies. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is sects? Discuss their role in multi-religious societies with empirical examples. -
2017 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Elaborate on various types of religious practices prevalent in India society -
2016 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss -
2016 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Religious pluralism is the order of present-day societies." Explain by giving suitable examples. -
2015 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between sects and cults with illustrations.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss
Religion and Society
Sociology emerged to explain industrial, political, and secular modern order. Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Mead, and Parsons mapped that object. Comparison with other types is a method, not a betrayal. Colonial India is inside modernity’s history, not outside sociology. Discuss: pre-eminently modern, not exclusively the contemporary West.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify
Sociology as Science
Value-free sociology is Weber’s split: values choose questions; proof stays disciplined. It is not Comte’s moral church, not Marx’s fusion of theory and practice, not a view from nowhere. Durkheim’s files, Mead’s interaction, and Harding’s standpoint show the strain. Clarify: a rule of demonstration, not a ban on moral topics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research
Research Methods and Analysis
Qualitative methods recover meaning, process, and context. Weber, Mead, Blumer, Geertz, and Merton justify that object. They reach hidden groups and latent functions that tables miss. They still need triangulation and comparison. Importance is complementarity with Census and survey magnitudes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.