Revision summary
Postulates: evidence, ordered explanation, public procedure, revisable hypotheses, organised scepticism. Durkheim, Merton, Census, and NFHS show substantial following. Weber, Mead, and Marx bend laboratory copies toward meaning, interaction, and critique. Parsons’s untested system talk falls short. How far: regulative core, not physics in a social lab.
Model answer
Introduction
Scientific method is a set of postulates about how claims should be made and checked. Sociology follows them in part. Meaning, values, and the lack of a closed laboratory limit a copy of experimental physics.
Body
Basic postulates
- Empiricism: claims answer to observation, records, or experiment, not to authority alone.
- Order and explanation: events are not miracles; we seek relations among variables.
- Publicity and replicability: procedures can be stated so another can try.
- Fallibilism: hypotheses are testable and revisable, as Karl Popper stressed against closed dogma.
- Logical consistency and conceptual clarity, which Max Weber’s ideal types serve.
- Organised scepticism, in Robert K. Merton’s ethos of science.
How far sociology follows
- Emile Durkheim’s suicide study is a model of using rates against prenotions.
- Surveys, Census, and NFHS operationalise variables and publish methods.
- Comparative historical work follows publicity more than laboratory replication.
Where it bends
- Weber’s verstehen is empirical about meaning, not a laboratory stimulus.
- George Herbert Mead’s interaction is hard to replicate as a protocol, yet can be triangulated.
- Value-relevance selects problems; Sandra Harding argues that unnamed values violate the spirit of publicity.
- Karl Marx’s critique treats surface empiricism as ideology if relations of production are ignored.
- Talcott Parsons’s grand system is often under-tested, which Merton’s middle range tried to correct.
Verdict
- Postulates are regulative. Sociological research follows them more in survey and official data, less in unstated ethnography and in unfalsifiable system talk.
- Following them “fully” as physics is the wrong test.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD POST[Empiricism publicity fallibilism] --> SOC[Sociological research] SOC --> YES[Surveys Census tests] SOC --> BEND[Meaning values history]
Conclusion
Scientific method postulates evidence, order, publicity, and revisable hypotheses. Durkheim, Merton, and survey practice follow that core. Weber, Mead, Marx, and Harding show why sociology cannot copy a closed experiment and must still keep the postulates as discipline, not as costume.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine Max Weber's method of maintaining objectivity in social research.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q4(a)). View answer →
-
If a study cannot be replicated, is it unscientific?
Unique historical cases cannot be rerun. They can still be documented so that the argument is public.
-
Does qualitative work reject these postulates?
It rejects a narrow operationalism. It should still state how the reading could be wrong.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is non-positivist methodology scientific? Illustrate. -
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research -
2016 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'value-free sociology'? Clarify -
2016 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine Max Weber's method of maintaining objectivity in social research. -
2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a science? Give reasons for your answer. -
2015 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the problems of maintaining objectivity and value neutrality in social science research. -
2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Non-positivist methodology is essential for understanding human behaviour." Discuss.
More from this topic
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does Weber's Verstehen address the objectivity-subjectivity debate in sociology?
Sociology as Science
Verstehen is interpretative understanding of meaningful social action. Ideal types help compare cases without pretending to be full copies of reality. Value relevance selects topics; value freedom forbids twisting evidence to preach. This rejects naive positivist objectivity as a view from nowhere. It also rejects the idea that interpretation is only the scholar’s private feeling. Actors’ meanings remain checkable through comparison, documents and consequences.
Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What do you mean by reliability? Discuss the importance of reliability in social science research.
Sociology as Science
Reliability is the consistency of a measure across time, items and raters. It differs from validity, which asks whether the right concept is being measured. Types include test–retest, split-half or alpha, and inter-coder agreement. Durkheimian rates and modern surveys both depend on stable classification. Qualitative work still needs transparent, repeatable coding. Without reliability, comparison, replication and policy use of data collapse.
Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is positivism? Critically analyze the major arguments against it
Sociology as Science
Positivism treats sociology as a science of observable regularities, after Comte and Durkheim. Its strength is accountability to data, comparison and replication. Weberian understanding, phenomenology and ethnomethodology deny that meanings are mere residuals. Critical theory and feminist standpoint theories deny the neutrality of the observer. Giddens’s double hermeneutic states that people already interpret the world sociologists study. Indian field studies show why census categories cannot replace meaning, even when counts remain essential.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.