Revision summary
Enlightenment made institutions worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Condorcet, Rousseau, and the philosophes prepared comparison, progress, and critique. Comte turned the programme into a named science. Revolution and industry supplied the crisis. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber are heirs who also criticised Enlightenment optimism.
Model answer
Introduction
Sociology emerged when industrial and political upheaval made society a problem. The Enlightenment contributed the intellectual permission: reason, comparison, progress, and a worldly account of institutions. It did not, by itself, write the discipline.
Body
What Enlightenment supplied
- Institutions were treated as human products, open to criticism, not as eternal mystery.
- Montesquieu compared laws and manners. Condorcet pictured progress through knowledge. Auguste Comte later turned that faith into a hierarchy of sciences with sociology at the peak.
- John Locke and later utilitarians centred the rights-bearing individual, which made social order a puzzle.
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau politicised inequality. Karl Marx would invert contract into class, but the question was already public.
- Voltaire and Diderot attacked sacred monopoly, opening secular explanation of crime, worship, and government.
What else was required
- The French Revolution showed that order can collapse. The Industrial Revolution showed new classes and cities.
- Conservative reaction, which Robert Nisbet stressed, also fed sociology: community, authority, and the sacred as problems.
- Emile Durkheim rebuilt moral solidarity. Max Weber read Enlightenment rationality as disenchantment and iron cage.
Contribution, stated tightly
- Naturalistic explanation, comparison, progress as a research programme, and the legitimacy of criticising custom.
- Sociology is heir and critic, not a hymn to the eighteenth century.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EN[Enlightenment] --> R[Reason comparison progress] EN --> C[Critique of dogma] IND[Industry revolution] --> SOC[Sociology] R --> SOC C --> SOC
Conclusion
Enlightenment reason, comparison, and critique made a science of society thinkable. Industry and revolution made it necessary. Comte named the science; Marx, Durkheim, and Weber rebuilt it around capitalism, solidarity, and rationalisation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Non-positivist methodology is essential for understanding human behaviour." Discuss.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Did Enlightenment create sociology in one country?
No. Scottish moral philosophy, French positivism, and later German historicism all fed it.
-
Is sociology only Enlightenment rationalism?
No. It studies religion, emotion, and domination, and it criticises the purely rational actor.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Is sociology common sense? Give reasons in support of your argument. -
2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
"Participant observation is the most effective tool for collecting facts." Comment. -
2016 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent is patriarchy a cause for the problems of women? Discuss -
2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Which concepts did Weber use to analyse the forms of legitimate domination? -
2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How is social equilibrium maintained in Parsonian framework? -
2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Define Secularisation. What are its major dimensions in the modern world? -
2015 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the dialectical relation between tradition and modernity in the study of social change. -
2015 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Elaborate the views of Durkheim on "The Elementary Forms of Religious Life"
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a science? Give reasons for your answer.
Sociology as Science
Sociology is a science of patterned social relations, not a physics of persons. Comte, Durkheim, and Marx claimed laws, facts, and historical regularities. Weber, Mead, and Merton add meaning, interaction, and middle-range theory. The claim holds as systematic social science, not as laboratory naturalism.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the relevance of historical method in the study of society.
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Historical method treats institutions as dated products, not as timeless attitudes. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim all needed sequences of production, domination, and solidarity. Indian caste, law, and Census household forms show path dependence. It situates survey and ethnography; it is not a substitute for them.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What are variables? Discuss their role in experimental research.
Research Methods and Analysis
A variable is a property with more than one value. Experiments isolate an independent condition and measure a dependent outcome, with controls. Durkheim and Merton already thought in relations among variables. Weber and Mead limit a stimulus–response reading of persons. Most sociology uses quasi-experiments and surveys, not a closed lab.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.