Revision summary
Deterritorialisation: practices unhook from one soil, via finance, media, and migration. The nation-state’s territorial monopoly of force is strained, not abolished. Marx’s world market and Wallerstein precede the slogan; Giddens and Appadurai name intensity. Borders, nationalism, and war re-territorialise. India: remittances and IT versus Census, farms, and internal social borders.
Model answer
Introduction
Deterritorialisation means social practices unhook from a single bounded place. Globalisation of capital, media, and migration does that. The nation-state is a territorial claim to law and force. The statement is strong as a tendency, not as the end of territory.
Body
What deterritorialisation names
- Arjun Appadurai’s scapes: finance, media, and people move across borders faster than maps.
- Anthony Giddens: time–space distanciation; modernity already stretched relations, globalisation intensifies it.
- Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system: accumulation was never only national.
Nation-state under strain
- Max Weber defined the state as monopoly of legitimate force in a territory. Capital flight, tax havens, and platforms weaken fiscal monopoly even when police remain local.
- Karl Marx already pictured a world market. The nation is a political form inside that market, not its master.
- Human rights, trade treaties, and rating agencies add extra-territorial rules.
- Diasporas vote, remit, and fund parties: belonging without exclusive soil.
Why territory returns
- Borders, passports, and camps are hyper-territorial. Migration control is a booming state craft.
- Nationalism resacralises soil, which Emile Durkheim’s civic cult and later civil religion help read.
- War and sanctions re-territorialise supply chains.
- Talcott Parsons’s goal-attainment subsystem, politics, still needs a territorial centre to tax and to war.
Indian reference
- Liberalisation after 1991, IT exports, and Gulf remittances deterritorialise livelihoods.
- The Census still counts a territorial population. Personal law and internal borders of caste–language re-territorialise intimacy.
- Farmers and informal workers remain place-bound while prices are global.
Examination
- Globalisation involves deterritorialisation of some circuits, especially finance and images.
- The nation-state is reorganised, not erased: it competes to host capital and to police people.
- Robert K. Merton’s latent function of “global culture” can be a new local inequality.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GLOB[Globalisation] --> DET[Deterritorial circuits] GLOB --> RET[Re-bordering] NS[Nation-state] --> FORCE[Weber territorial force] DET --> NS RET --> NS
Conclusion
Deterritorialisation is a real dimension of globalisation, especially for capital and media. The nation-state remains the territorial organiser of force, census, and most welfare. Examine unhooking and re-bordering together. Weber’s state and Marx’s world market are both still on the map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Has the nation-state ended?
No. It has changed tasks: attract capital, police mobility, and still wage law inside borders.
-
Is the internet placeless?
Content travels. Cables, moderation laws, and identity documents still sit in territories.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss. -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Ideology is crucial for social transformation in a democracy." Discuss. -
2015 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain the conditions under which a collective action transforms into a social movement. -
2015 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Caste ideology appears to have strengthened democracy .Comment.
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain
Politics and Society
Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues
Politics and Society
Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations
Politics and Society
Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.