Q7(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q6(b) Q8(a) →

The island of Kachchatheevu remains an intractable issue in India-Sri Lanka relations. Comment

Page facts
Exam
Union Public Service Commission — Civil Services Examination (UPSC)
Board
UPSC
Stage
Mains
Year
2026
Paper
UPSC Mains — PSIR GS 2 (Paper II) (PSIR GS 2)
Question
Q7(b)
Marks
15
Topic
India and the Global South
Syllabus
India and the Global South: Relations with Africa and Latin America; leadership role in the demand for NIEO and WTO negotiations.

Topic: India and the Global South. Syllabus: India and the Global South: Relations with Africa and Latin America; leadership role in the demand for NIEO and WTO negotiations. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2026 and India and the Global South.

Revision summary

The Kachchatheevu island issue stems from the 1974 and 1976 Indo-Sri Lankan maritime boundary agreements which ceded the islet to Colombo. While legally settled, it persists as a live domestic political debate involving Tamil Nadu's regional parties and New Delhi. Livelihood concerns of Indian fishermen facing Sri Lankan naval action complicate bilateral ties. Strategic anxieties regarding regional security further elevate the issue in contemporary geopolitics. Resolving it requires a fine balance between cooperative maritime diplomacy and safeguarding domestic fisherfolk interests.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

The Kachchatheevu island dispute represents a complex intersection of historical maritime agreements, federal-state dynamics in India, and transnational livelihood security. Ceded to Sri Lanka via bilateral accords in the 1970s, the uninhabited islet continues to evoke strong political and humanitarian resonance.

Body

Historical Evolution and Legal Basis

Kachchatheevu was historically used by both Indian and Sri Lankan fishermen for drying nets, leading to competing traditional claims. The 1974 Indo-Sri Lankan Maritime Boundary Agreement recognized Sri Lanka's sovereignty over the island, followed by the 1976 agreement which restricted fishing rights in adjacent waters.

  • Bilateral Treaties: The 1974 and 1976 agreements drew the international maritime boundary line (IMBL) north of Kachchatheevu, settling colonial-era ambiguity.
  • Legal Standing: The Union government maintains that the island was ceded following constitutional procedures, though the legal validity remains contested by regional political actors in domestic forums.

Domestic Political Resonance

The issue occupies a central space in Tamil Nadu's political discourse, frequently resurfacing during electoral cycles and straining cooperative federalism.

  • Federal Friction: State-level political parties consistently pressure the Union government to reclaim the island or renegotiate fishing rights.
  • Constitutional Debate: The debate often highlights the tensions between center-led foreign policy prerogatives and state-level security interests.

Livelihood and Maritime Security Dilemmas

The core contemporary friction stems from the enforcement of the IMBL by the Sri Lankan Navy against Indian fishermen from Tamil Nadu.

  • Fishermen Interventions: Traditional fishing grounds overlap with restricted zones, leading to frequent arrests, seizure of trawlers, and humanitarian crises.
  • Trawling Concerns: Ecological degradation in the Palk Bay due to bottom trawling by Indian vessels adds a distinct environmental dimension to the security conflict.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  A[Historical Use] -->|1974-76 Accords| B[Sovereignty to SL]
  B --> C[IMBL Demarcation]
  C --> D[Fishermen Livelihood Conflict]
  D --> E[Tamil Nadu Political Pressure]
  E --> F[Bilateral Diplomatic Dialogue]

Conclusion

Kachchatheevu illustrates the limits of purely legalistic boundary settlements in managing deeply embedded transnational communities. Moving forward, India and Sri Lanka must leverage institutional mechanisms like the Joint Working Group on Fisheries to prioritize humanitarian concerns, regulate sustainable fishing, and insulate bilateral ties from domestic political friction.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

Critically evaluate India-Russia relations in the 21st century. How have both the countries responded to America meddling in their relations in the recent times?

India and the Global South

- India and Russia share a "Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership" driven by defense, energy, and multipolar goals, moving beyond Cold War ties. - Core cooperation rests on defense production (BrahMos), discounted oil imports pushing trade past $50 billion, and joint platforms like BRICS and SCO. - Structural challenges include Russia's heavy reliance on China post-2022, a major trade deficit favoring Moscow, and differing views on the Indo-Pacific. - Both capitals counter Western pressure (like CAATSA and SWIFT restrictions) by asserting strategic autonomy and bypassing dollar-based payment systems. - Moscow implicitly tolerates India's QUAD participation, while New Delhi maintains independent foreign policy choices despite U.S. pressure. - The relationship survives on pragmatic adaptation rather than sentiment, remaining a vital pillar of India's multi-aligned foreign policy framework.

Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

Latin America has made moderate success in countering US-led global economic order by framing various organizations emphasizing regional sovereignty, economic integration and alternative development. Discuss

India and the Global South

Latin America answered U.S. economic primacy with Mercosur, ALBA, UNASUR, CELAC, Banco del Sur and Brazil’s BRICS role. The intellectual root is ECLAC, Prebisch and dependency: unequal exchange and the need for regional policy space. Success is moderate: some intra-trade, a diplomacy without Washington in CELAC, and diversified China markets. The dollar, IMF programmes and U.S. financial cycles still dominate crises. Cyclical politics and a reluctant Brazilian paymaster explain the ceiling.

PDF