Revision summary
Democratic backsliding is incremental erosion of referees by elected executives, not always a coup. Democratic backlash is resistance by courts, streets, media and opposition victories. The paradox is that both run together in a polarised decade, on different clocks. Hungary, the United States, Brazil, Poland and Iran illustrate different mixes of erosion and resistance. Not every backlash is liberal; the task is to distinguish civic repair from counter-populism.
Model answer
Introduction
The 2020s are not a simple story of democracy’s death or of democracy’s revenge. Nancy Bermeo, Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, and the V-Dem project describe democratic backsliding: erosion from inside, often by elected executives. At the same time, democratic backlash — courts, streets, journalists, and opposition wins — has returned in several places. The paradox is that both processes now run as twins, not as chapters in sequence.
Body
Backsliding
Backsliding is rarely a colonels’ coup. It is executive aggrandisement, packed courts, captured regulators, tilted electoral law, harassment of the press, and the treatment of opponents as enemies of the nation. Hungary under Viktor Orbán, Turkey after successive shocks to the opposition, Venezuela’s long hollow, and fights over certification and the rule of law in the United States are standard illustrations. Culture war, migration panics, and inequality supply the fuel. Centre-right and radical-right coalitions have been the usual vehicles, which is why the next question on left setbacks belongs in the same decade.
Backlash
Backlash is not automatic sunshine. It is costly mobilisation. Poland’s 2023 opposition coalition ended eight years of Law and Justice rule. Brazil’s 2022 vote removed Jair Bolsonaro, then had to survive a 8 January 2023 assault on the plazas of power. Israel’s 2023 judicial-overhaul crisis filled the streets. Women’s movements, including Iranian and other West Asian protests, are backlash against patriarchal closure, not only against a left–right scorecard. In India, a noisy opposition, a still-independent strand of the higher judiciary, and a competitive if strained federal map are part of backlash capacity even when critics allege backsliding on other metrics.
Why the twin process
The paradox dissolves once time-scales are separated. Backsliding is often incremental and legalistic. Backlash is episodic and public. Polarisation produces both: the same identity heat that lets a leader dismantle referees also produces counter-identity. International demonstration effects work both ways — Orbánism travels, so do protest repertoires. Digital platforms organise rallies and also drown them in disinformation. Robert Dahl’s polyarchy always rested on contestation plus inclusion; when contestation is attacked, inclusion fights back, unevenly.
- A further twist: backlash can itself be illiberal (majoritarian street against minorities). Not every crowd is a civic culture. The analyst’s job is to sort liberal-democratic repair from counter-populism. The world is in the throes of both, which is why a single headline — “the end of democracy” or “the people have won” — is bad comparative politics.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Polarisation] --> B[Backsliding] P --> L[Backlash] B --> E[Captured referees] L --> R[Courts streets votes] E -.meets.-> R
Conclusion
Backsliding erodes referees from above. Backlash tries to restore or reinvent them from below and beside. They coexist because polarised societies produce both strongmen and their antibodies. The outcome is unsettled, country by country.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How successful has the 'ASEAN Plus Three' been in addressing regional problems? Support your answer with specific examples
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q4(b)). View answer →
-
Is backsliding the same as a coup?
Usually no. Bermeo distinguishes promissory coups, executive aggrandisement and strategic harassment of the opposition. The last two dominate recent cases.
-
Does backlash always win?
No. Turkey, Venezuela and several Sahel cases show failed or reversed backlash. Wins need organisation, elite splits and usable institutions.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment. -
2025 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises. -
2025 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights. -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
How successful has the 'ASEAN Plus Three' been in addressing regional problems? Support your answer with specific examples -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
"Trump's return to the White House is a jolt to push the European Union to invest in its own defence and economic and technological revival." Comment -
2025 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Would you agree with the contention that India's inclination to lean on a 'more aggressive hyper-realist posture' has gained a new momentum in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist strike? Comment. -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
NonAlignment 2·0 underscores India's unique aspiration to emerge as a site for an alternative universality. Comment
Comparative Politics
NonAlignment 2.0 (2012) restated strategic autonomy for a China-first, post-NAM world: partner the U.S., do not join it. Alternative universality means rules others can inhabit without becoming Western or Chinese tributaries. India’s civilisational pluralism, Global South voice, and issue-based coalitions are the claimed site. The aspiration is coherent; capacity in the neighbourhood and in manufacturing is the constraint. The risk is exceptionalism dressed as universality.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?
Comparative Politics
Trump’s 2025 reciprocal tariffs, on top of a blocked Appellate Body, treat MFN as optional and threaten WTO as policeman. Salvage options: restore appeals or widen MPIA, plurilaterals, a subsidy-for-S&DT reform bargain, G20 politics, and FTA hedges. India’s stake is public stockholding, digital rules and a forum in which power is not the only law. A variable-geometry WTO is more likely than a 1995 restoration. Letting the organisation die would leave only tariff nationalism.
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership
Comparative Politics
U.S. reciprocal tariffs in 2025 threatened both Indian and EU exports and compressed FTA timelines. The partnership already includes TTC, climate talk, student mobility and a values vocabulary. Friction remains on agriculture, data, CBAM, Russia and human-rights politics. Directionally closer is true; a finished trade-and-tech pole is not yet true. India–EU is the best Western hedge if Washington stays protectionist, not a substitute for U.S. defence enablers.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.