Revision summary
Political socialisation is the learning of political attitudes, skills and identities. Open societies use competing agents — family, school, parties, plural media — and allow doubt. Closed societies monopolise the story through party, clergy or police and punish dissent. Almond, Verba, Easton, Hyman and Popper supply the vocabulary; Iran, China and backsliding democracies are living cases. No regime is perfectly open or closed; smartphones and migration leak closed systems.
Model answer
Introduction
Political socialisation is the learning of political attitudes, skills and identities across a life. Herbert Hyman, Almond and Verba, and Easton and Dennis made it a comparative variable. The contrast between open and closed societies is about who may teach, what may be doubted, and whether exit and voice exist.
Body
Open societies
In an open society — Karl Popper’s phrase, used here as a political type — family, school, party, union, temple or mosque, and a plural press compete. Children meet disagreement. Adult socialisation continues through elections, courts and social media. The civic culture can be participant without being unanimous. Mistakes are public. Democratic backsliding in the 2020s shows the type is fragile: capturing the public broadcaster, punishing campuses, or flooding the net with a single story is how an open order begins to close.
Closed societies
A closed society monopolises the story of the state. The party, leader, clergy or secret police is the authorised teacher. Family and school repeat the line. Dissent is treated as disease or treason. Hannah Arendt on total ideology, and later studies of the Soviet Union, Maoist campaigns, North Korea and theocratic police, describe intense closed socialisation. Contemporary Iran after Woman, Life, Freedom shows both the monopoly (morality police, compulsory hijab) and its leak: private satellite, Instagram, and the red lipstick of protest. China combines market opening with tight control of history, Xinjiang and the internet — a hybrid, not a pure type.
Agents and outcomes
Agents are the same nouns — family, school, media, peer group, workplace — with unlike verbs. Open systems produce cross-pressured citizens and peaceful turnover, but also polarisation and conspiracy. Closed systems produce conformity, fear, and sudden breaks when the script fails (1989, Arab Spring, 2022 Iran). Migration and smartphones make perfectly closed socialisation harder. Perfectly open socialisation is a myth too: every democracy has official history, a flag, and a security taboo.
Comparative politics therefore treats openness as a spectrum. Electoral autocracies socialise for applause, not for alternation. Liberal democracies socialise for contest, and then argue about whether universities and platforms still allow it.
Flow diagram
flowchart LR O[Open society] --> C[Competing agents] X[Closed society] --> M[Monopoly script] C --> D[Doubt and turnover] M --> F[Fear and rupture]
Conclusion
Open societies socialise through competing teachers and the right to doubt. Closed societies socialise through monopoly and fear. Most living regimes sit between, and move.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights.
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is social media opening closed societies?
It leaks information and organises protest, but it also lets closed regimes surveil, shame and flood. The net is an agent, not a liberal guarantee.
-
Are Indian schools ‘open’?
India is constitutionally open: many parties, a free press in law, and contested textbooks. Capture of boards, campus policing and communal pressure can still close the classroom in practice.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Of late, centrist and centre-left political parties have been facing setbacks while centre-right parties have been in ascendency the world over. Comment -
2024 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world. -
2024 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the role of political parties in sustaining and stabilising democracies in the developing societies. -
2022 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of social movements in strengthening the democratic processes in developing societies -
2021 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.