Revision summary
Global South diplomacy continues NAM and G77 in a new institutional setting. India hosted South summits and used G20 2023 to seat the African Union. ITEC, credit, vaccines, and UN peacekeeping are the material side. WTO food and IP fights remain part of the same file. China’s finance is the main competitor for Southern attention.
Model answer
Introduction
Global South diplomacy is India’s claim to speak with developing countries on trade, climate finance, food, and UN reform. It continues NAM and G77 habits with new platforms such as the Voice of Global South Summit and the G20 year 2023.
Body
Lineage
- NAM, the G77, and UNCTAD are the older stages. India used them for decolonisation, NIEO language, and later for climate differentiation.
- The claim is leadership without a formal empire and without OECD membership.
Current instruments
- Voice of Global South Summits collected demands on debt, fuel, and fertiliser before and during the Indian G20 presidency.
- African Union seating in the G20 was presented as a South win inside a Northern-heavy table.
- ITEC, lines of credit, vaccines, and peacekeeping are material complements to speeches.
- At the WTO, India still defends public stockholding and told the TRIPS-waiver story in 5(c).
Limits
- Many Southern States also deal with China as banker and builder. India’s offer is smaller in capital.
- Multi-alignment with the Quad can look, to some NAM members, like a tilt. India answers with autonomy and with Russia and energy ties.
- Diplomacy succeeds when it delivers finance, technology, and UN voice, not when it only recalls Bandung.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[NAM G77] --> V[Voice of Global South] V --> G[G20 2023 AU seat] G --> T[Trade climate UN votes] I[ITEC credit PKO] --> T
Conclusion
India’s Global South diplomacy is NAM lineage plus G20-era convening and development tools. It is real as voice and training. It is constrained as a capital alternative to China.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India - Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is Global South a formal organisation?
No. It is a political category. NAM and G77 are organisations. G20 is a mixed table that India tried to open further.
-
Does Quad membership cancel this diplomacy?
It creates a tension that India manages by insisting on autonomy and by keeping South forums active.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine India's persistent refusal to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) despite being recognized as a de facto nuclear power. -
2023 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What is the structure and functions of International Court of Justice? -
2022 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the composition of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Discuss its voluntary jurisdiction -
2022 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the efficacy of global conventions to combat international terrorism -
2022 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the reasons behind India's refusal to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT)
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the crucial functions of empirical political theory in Comparative Politics?
Comparative Politics
Empirical political theory studies observable political facts with concepts that evidence can test. Its functions are description, classification, explanation, middle-range theory, and checking claims against practice. It shifted Comparative Politics from legal texts alone toward behaviour and institutions. Sartori’s warning against conceptual stretching is part of that discipline. It does not cancel culture or critical theory; it supplies the evidence those approaches still need.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the difficulties faced by a political theorist in comparing the States?
Comparative Politics
States are unlike in size, history, and capacity, so the unit of comparison is not automatic. Conceptual stretching, Galton’s problem, and selection bias are standard difficulties. Data are political products, and language changes the meaning of institutions. Interdependence means States are not independent experiments. Designs such as most-similar cases reduce error; they do not remove it.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does democratic politics construct citizenship?
Comparative Politics
Citizenship in a democracy is made by law, votes, and social rights, not only by birth records. Marshall’s civil, political, and social rights describe how that status has thickened. Parties, movements, and civic education teach people to act as citizens. Democracies still contest migrants, minorities, and documents of belonging. Construction is therefore both inclusion and a fight over who is inside.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.