Revision summary
Gallie’s essentially contested concepts fit national interest. Morgenthau tried to fix it as power; Carr showed it as ideology of the strong. Keohane and liberals thicken it with institutions and absolute gains. Wendt and Marxists relocate it in identity or class. Policy still uses the word; analysis must unpack it.
Model answer
Introduction
National interest is the working phrase of foreign policy. W. B. Gallie called some concepts essentially contested: the dispute is about meaning, not only about facts. National interest is one of those concepts.
Body
Why it is contested
- Hans Morgenthau presented interest defined as power as an objective compass. Even he admitted that the concrete content changes with time and culture.
- E. H. Carr showed that great powers dress their interest as the interest of the international community.
- Liberals and Robert Keohane’s institutionalists include absolute gains, trade, and regimes inside “interest.” Realists keep relative power and survival first.
- Constructivists after Alexander Wendt treat interest as socially made: identity tells a State what to want.
- Marxists treat the official national interest as often the interest of a dominant class or of capital.
Practice
- In India the same word covers Panchsheel, the 1971 treaty tilt, the 1998 tests, and later Quad consultations. Each government claims continuity of interest.
- Security, welfare, prestige, and values compete. There is no single algorithm that ends the argument.
What follows for analysis
- The concept is indispensable and unstable. The scholar’s job is to name whose interest, which time horizon, and which theory is being smuggled in.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NI[National interest] --> R[Realist power survival] NI --> L[Liberal gains regimes] NI --> C[Constructivist identity] NI --> M[Marxist class]
Conclusion
National interest is essentially contested because power, welfare, identity, and class offer rival contents for the same word. Morgenthau’s compass is a starting claim, not a settlement.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How has the electoral democracy augmented the participation of people in the democratic process?
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
If the concept is contested, can it guide policy?
Yes, as a debate. Cabinets still rank threats. The error is to treat one ranking as science.
-
Is survival the uncontested core?
Realists say so. Even survival can mean territorial integrity, regime security, or nuclear status, which are not the same.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Transnational actors have qualitatively transformed the world by the way of their fresh insights and actions. Illustrate your answer with suitable examples -
2025 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Collective security and responsibility to protect (R2P) are uniform neither in scope, goals and methods. Explain -
2023 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the relevance of the normative ethos of the Non-Aligned Movement in magnifying India's soft power in pursuit of her national interest -
2022 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the conceptual dimensions of collective security -
2021 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What is complex interdependence? Discuss the role of transnational actors in the international system
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.