Revision summary
Fifteen judges serve nine-year terms after parallel Assembly and Council elections. Legal-system representation is a Statute goal; ad hoc judges fill nationality gaps. Contentious jurisdiction is consent-based: compromis, treaty, or optional clause. Article 36(2) declarations usually carry reservations and reciprocity. Advisory opinions and Article 94 enforcement sit beside, not inside, that voluntary core.
Model answer
Introduction
The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It sits at The Hague under the UN Charter and the ICJ Statute. Composition is elective. Jurisdiction in contentious cases is voluntary.
Body
Composition
- Article 3 of the Statute provides 15 judges. No two may be nationals of the same State.
- Judges are elected for nine-year terms by the General Assembly and the Security Council, voting independently. Five seats turn over every three years.
- The Statute asks for representation of the main forms of civilisation and the principal legal systems, not for a simple P5 court, though practice has often included a judge from each permanent member.
- Ad hoc judges may sit when a party has no national on the bench.
- Chambers, including a Chamber of Summary Procedure, may hear particular cases. Official languages are English and French.
- Only States may be parties in contentious proceedings. The Registry is the permanent secretariat.
Voluntary jurisdiction
- Consent is the gate. A State may accept jurisdiction by special agreement (compromis), by a treaty clause, or by a declaration under the optional clause of Article 36(2) of the Statute.
- Optional-clause declarations are often riddled with reservations as to time, subject, and reciprocity. The Court still needs a matching title of jurisdiction.
- Forum prorogatum and transfer from the Permanent Court of International Justice supply other consent paths.
- Advisory opinions requested by the General Assembly, the Security Council, or authorised agencies are not judgments between States. They do not rest on the same bilateral consent.
What voluntary means in practice
- Powerful States can stay outside a case, as the United States did after Nicaragua in the 1980s by limiting its optional-clause exposure.
- Judgments bind the parties to that case. Article 94 of the UN Charter points enforcement toward the Security Council, which remains political.
- Voluntary jurisdiction is therefore a legal technique of a society of sovereigns, not a world supreme court.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD S[ICJ Statute] --> J[15 judges elected] S --> O[Article 36 optional clause] O --> C[Consent reservations] C --> T[Contentious case] J --> T
Conclusion
The ICJ is a 15-judge UN court elected by the Assembly and the Council. Its contentious jurisdiction exists only where States have consented, especially through the optional clause with reservations. Composition is professional and representative in design. Power still sits at the consent gate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the rise of People's Republic of China (PRC) as a great power and its implications on Asian Political order
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Are all UN members under ICJ compulsory jurisdiction?
Members are parties to the Statute. A contentious case still needs a specific consent title.
-
Can a person sue at the ICJ?
No. Only States are parties in contentious cases. Individuals use other courts and treaty bodies.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine India's persistent refusal to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) despite being recognized as a de facto nuclear power. -
2023 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What is the structure and functions of International Court of Justice? -
2023 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What diplomatic steps has India taken to articulate the interests of the Global South in International Politics? -
2022 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the efficacy of global conventions to combat international terrorism -
2022 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the reasons behind India's refusal to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT)
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.