Revision summary
Globalisation is denser cross-border economic and social connection. Wallerstein reads it as world-economy deepening. Bhagwati and institutionalists stress gains and rules. Stiglitz and dependency stress crises and unequal rules. Political backlash and shared sovereignty are part of the consequence set.
Model answer
Introduction
Globalisation is the thickening of cross-border flows of goods, capital, people, data, and rules. The debate is not whether borders still exist. It is who gains, who is exposed, and whether the State remains the master of the process.
Body
What it is
- Intensity and speed of interconnection, not the first caravan in history.
- Production chains, finance, and digital platforms sit beside older trade.
- Immanuel Wallerstein would say it is the latest deepening of a capitalist world-economy, not a sudden flat world.
Consequences: the optimistic case
- Growth through trade, technology diffusion, and poverty reduction in export platforms, as Jagdish Bhagwati-style liberals argue.
- Absolute gains and regimes, in Robert Keohane’s institutionalist language, can make openness self-reinforcing.
- Diasporas and ideas widen choice.
Consequences: the critical case
- Uneven development, footloose capital, and a race on labour and tax.
- Joseph Stiglitz stressed crises from premature financial opening.
- Cultural homogenisation and a democratic deficit in treaty bodies.
- Dependency and world-system writers treat “win–win” as ideology of the core.
Political consequences
- Sovereignty becomes shared with investors and dispute panels.
- Populist backlash is a domestic consequence, not only a Southern complaint.
- Climate and pandemic show that flows carry harm as well as goods.
A working judgment
- Globalisation is structured, not neutral. Consequences depend on position in Wallerstein’s hierarchy and on domestic institutions that Huntington would call the capacity to absorb mobilisation.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Globalisation] --> F[Flows trade capital data] F --> L[Liberal growth regimes] F --> C[Critical hierarchy crises] L --> D[Debate on consequences] C --> D
Conclusion
Globalisation is intensified interdependence of markets, rules, and communication. Liberals count growth and regimes. Critics count hierarchy, volatility, and lost policy space. Both describe real slices. The debate is about distribution and control, not about whether ships move.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the decline of the United States of America as a hegemon and its implications for the changing international political order
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is globalisation the same as Americanisation?
US firms and culture are heavy. China, Gulf capital, and South–South trade show more than one centre.
-
Can a State opt out?
It can slow finance or trade. Full exit is costly. The real choice is how to bargain inside the flows.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics. -
2021 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain -
2021 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emergence of neo-realism and its basic tenets -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries -
2021 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? -
2021 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the success of ASEAN as a regional organisation -
2021 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Write about the growing significance of QUAD. -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.