Revision summary
India and South Africa tabled a COVID TRIPS waiver in 2020. The claim was that patents blocked scaled production of vaccines and treatments. Doha public-health language was the legal-moral precedent. Compulsory licensing was judged too cumbersome for a global shock. Rich-country resistance narrowed the outcome; the Indian position stayed pro-waiver.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
In October 2020 India and South Africa asked the WTO TRIPS Council to waive certain intellectual-property rules on COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. India’s position was that patents were blocking scale in a pandemic.
Body
The demand
- A time-limited waiver of TRIPS obligations on patents, designs, and undisclosed information for COVID health products.
- Compulsory licensing under existing TRIPS was called too slow and too narrow when many countries needed to produce at once.
- The aim was technology transfer and generic manufacture, not a permanent abolition of IP.
India’s argument
- Public health emergency overrides ordinary rent from patents, in the spirit of Doha 2001 on TRIPS and public health.
- Vaccine nationalism and advanced-country buying left the Global South short.
- India as a pharmacy of the South claimed both capacity and a duty to supply.
The politics of the file
- Many developed members resisted a broad waiver. The United States later backed a narrower vaccine-focused discussion.
- A 2022 Ministerial compromise was thinner than the original India–South Africa text. The 2021 question is the demand, not that later deal.
Link to IR
- The episode is Cox-style: whose property regime a global institution serves in a crisis.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IS[India South Africa 2020] --> W[TRIPS waiver proposal] W --> V[Vaccines diagnostics therapeutics] R[IP holders rich members] --> O[Opposition delay] W[W] --> O[O]
Conclusion
India, with South Africa, sought a TRIPS waiver so that COVID vaccines and related tools could be produced widely. The position treated IP as a barrier in a pandemic, not as an untouchable right. WTO consensus made the original wide waiver hard to land.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q5(e)). View answer →
-
Did India want to abolish pharmaceutical patents?
No. The proposal was a time-bound pandemic waiver for specified COVID products.
-
Was COVAX India’s substitute for a waiver?
India supported supply initiatives and still argued that IP rules constrained manufacturing capacity.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks · Solution
India has recognised that West Asia is not a single contest, but a tangle of rivalries, bargains and anxieties. Comment
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
This 15-mark model answer for UPSC CSE Mains examines India's evolved diplomacy in West Asia, transitioning from a monolithic view to navigating complex regional rivalries, strategic bargains, and security anxieties. It highlights India's de-hyphenated engagement with Israel, Iran, and the Arab Gulf, robust energy diplomacy, diaspora protection, and minilateral frameworks like I2U2. The conclusion anchors this pragmatic realism within India's strategic autonomy and Act West policy.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
What strategic options can India exercise as a response to the tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan?
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India faces a complex security landscape due to Durand Line tensions and cross-border terrorism between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Strategic options include proactive diplomatic engagement with the Taliban regime to secure developmental investments, intelligence-sharing and capacity-building with regional partners like Iran and Central Asian Republics, and maintaining a strict posture on counter-terrorism. By leveraging multilateral platforms such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and reinforcing soft-power outreach through humanitarian aid, New Delhi can safeguard its core security interests. Simultaneously, India must balance its defensive posture with strategic autonomy, ensuring regional stability without direct military entanglement in the Pashtun belt.
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.