Revision summary
The core file is an unsettled Himalayan boundary. Doklam 2017 and Galwan 2020 are the named recent crises. CPEC through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is a sovereignty and two-front issue. The Indian Ocean and South Asian projects extend the contest beyond the ridge. Status in the UN and Asian clubs is the diplomatic layer of the same rivalry.
Model answer
Introduction
India and China share a long disputed Himalayan frontier and a crowded Asian order. Geostrategic contention is territorial, maritime, and institutional. Doklam and Galwan are named shocks on a deeper map.
Body
The land frontier
- Unresolved boundary: Aksai Chin, the McMahon Line, and the status of the so-called LAC.
- 1962 war memory structures military planning.
- Doklam 2017: a stand-off at the Bhutan–China–India trijunction, about a road and the Siliguri corridor’s depth.
- Galwan 2020: lethal clash in eastern Ladakh that ended a long political pretence of managed peace.
The Pakistan and Himalayan wedge
- China–Pakistan strategic tie and the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
- India reads CPEC as a sovereignty and two-front problem, not only a trade road.
The maritime and neighbourhood ring
- Indian Ocean dual-use ports, submarine visits, and a growing PLA Navy.
- Influence in Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and Bangladesh through finance and projects.
- Tibet and the Dalai Lama remain a political-security residue of 1950s incorporation.
Order and status
- China’s rise, as Waltz would count capability, shrinks India’s room in Asia.
- UN Security Council permanent membership, NSG, and Asian institutions are status contests.
- The Quad and Act East are Indian replies, not the cause of the border file.
What is not the whole story
- Trade remains large. Contention is geostrategic even when shops are full.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[Boundary LAC] --> D[Doklam 2017] B --> G[Galwan 2020] CPEC[CPEC PoK] --> T[Two-front fear] IOR[Indian Ocean] --> T D --> GS[Geostrategic contention] G --> GS T --> GS
Conclusion
Points of contention are the boundary (Doklam, Galwan, Aksai Chin, Arunachal), the China–Pakistan corridor, the Indian Ocean, and status in Asian and UN order. Interdependence in trade has not dissolved the security dilemma.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is trade a cushion against war?
It raises the cost of rupture. Galwan showed that it does not prevent force on the LAC.
-
Is Tibet still a live contention?
India accepts the Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the PRC in formal notes, yet the refugee community and Himalayan military geography keep it politically sensitive.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Historical ties between India and Japan grew into a 'special strategic and global partnership'. Comment. -
2024 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The Gramscian theory of hegemony provides many valuable insights into the nature of global power." Comment. -
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Bhutan has historically been an ally of India, but the China-Bhutan border-related issues have become a security issue for India. Discuss. -
2022 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the main drivers of India-Japan Strategic and Global Partnership? -
2021 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"Non-alignment was little more than a rational strategy on the part of a materially weak India to maximise its interests with a bipolar distribution of global power." Comment
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.