Revision summary
India took parliamentary cabinet government, Westminster procedure, and much 1935 institutional design from Britain. Dicey’s rule of law influenced Article 14, but India wrote rights and judicial review into the text. Federal lists, the Governor, and emergencies also travel from the 1935 Act. Austin’s cornerstone argument treats this as a new nation’s charter, not a colonial statute continued. Parliamentary sovereignty in the British sense was refused.
Model answer
Introduction
The Constitution of India is a written republican charter, not an unwritten British one. The imprint of the British Constitution is still clear in parliamentary government, cabinet responsibility, and several offices copied from Westminster and from the Government of India Act, 1935.
Body
What was taken
- A parliamentary executive: the President is a constitutional head, and the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, which follows the British cabinet model.
- Rule of law, in A. V. Dicey’s sense of regular law and official liability, informed equality before the law in Article 14, even though India added a written bill of rights that Britain then lacked.
- A bicameral Union Parliament, a Speaker, questions, and an opposition are Westminster forms.
- The Comptroller and Auditor General, the public service commission, and the single integrated judiciary’s common-law method continue colonial and British institutional habits.
- The Government of India Act, 1935, supplied federal lists, office-of-governor, and emergency provisions that the Constituent Assembly adapted.
What was refused
- India is a republic with a written constitution, judicial review, and fundamental rights, which Granville Austin treated as the legal basis of a new nation, not as a statute of the Crown.
- Federalism, adult franchise from the first general election, and social-revolution Directives are not British parliamentary essentials.
- Ambedkar said the Constitution could work if people who ran it were good; the text itself rejected an unwritten convention as the only guarantee.
- Basic structure after Kesavananda Bharati (1973) is a judicial limit unknown to Dicey’s parliamentary sovereignty.
How to state the imprint
- The imprint is strongest in daily parliamentary practice and in 1935 institutional furniture.
- The identity of the Constitution is still Indian: written limits, rights, and a social programme that Westminster in 1950 did not enact as higher law.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[British imprint] --> C[Cabinet responsibility] B --> D[Dicey rule of law] B --> A[1935 Act furniture] I[Indian identity] --> R[Republic rights federalism] I --> K[Kesavananda limits]
Conclusion
British imprint on the Indian Constitution is parliamentary cabinet government, rule-of-law language, and 1935 offices. The Indian text adds a republic, rights, federalism, and judicially enforced limits that Dicey’s sovereign parliament did not know.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution reflects itself as a 'social contract'. Elucidate.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Is India a Westminster system without change?
It is a parliamentary system with a written constitution, a republic, federalism, and judicial review, which Westminster in 1950 did not combine in that way.
-
Did the British Constitution give India fundamental rights?
No. Britain then relied on ordinary statutes and conventions. Part III is an Indian and comparative borrowing, not a British imprint in the same sense.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Constitutional morality in the Indian Constitution. -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution reflects itself as a 'social contract'. Elucidate. -
2022 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The making of the Indian Constitution is described as an attempt towards a 'social revolution'. Comment -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"The Constitution makers faced the great task of forging a common national identity in the face of unparalleled social and cultural diversity in India." Comment. -
2021 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain how caste as a social category is also becoming a political category in the democratic politics of India
More from this topic
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Constitutional morality in the Indian Constitution.
Making of the Indian Constitution
Constitutional morality is respect for constitutional forms, rights, and limits beyond the will of a passing majority. Ambedkar treated it as necessary because Indian social life still contained caste hierarchy. Part III, judicial review, federalism, and parliamentary procedure are the institutional face of that morality. Kesavananda’s basic structure is a judicial cousin of the same idea. The term is contested when courts apply it, but its political core remains a warning against personal and purely majoritarian rule.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The making of the Indian Constitution is described as an attempt towards a 'social revolution'. Comment
Making of the Indian Constitution
Austin named social revolution as a strand of the constitutional web beside democracy and unity. Ambedkar drafted justiciable equality, including abolition of untouchability, as the legal engine. Directive Principles state economic democracy as a continuing duty. Land reform and reservations extend the attempt against estates and caste monopoly. The making is an attempt; social facts still lag the text.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution reflects itself as a 'social contract'. Elucidate.
Making of the Indian Constitution
The Preamble’s “We, the People” is popular contract language of self-authorisation. Justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity are the terms of the trust, closer to Locke and Rousseau than to Hobbes. Austin treated this as the Assembly’s nation-making bargain. Kesavananda tied the Preamble to basic structure. Ambedkar’s social democracy is the test of whether the contract is lived.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.