Revision summary
Gram Swaraj is Gandhi’s village self-rule in production and decision, stated in Hind Swaraj and village writings. The quoted task is local resource identification for farm and small industry. The 73rd Amendment and Eleventh Schedule constitutionalise that task through panchayat and gram sabha. Mehta committees had asked for planning from below long before 1992. Without real devolution and a power to refuse extraction, mapping is not swaraj.
Model answer
Introduction
The statement asks panchayats and gram sabhas to map local resources for farm and small-industry development. M. K. Gandhi’s Gram Swaraj is the right context: the village republic as a producing and deciding community, not a mere agency of a distant plan.
Body
Gram Swaraj
- In Hind Swaraj and later village writings, Gandhi wanted swaraj as self-rule in the village: bread labour, khadi, and a limit on industrial centralisation.
- Gram Swaraj is moral and economic. The gram sabha is the people in assembly, not only a statutory quorum.
- Jayaprakash Narayan and the after-Gandhi sarvodaya stream kept the village as the unit of planning.
- The statement’s stress on identifying local resources is Gandhian: development starts from what the place already has, not from a ministry template alone.
Constitutional organisation
- The 73rd Constitutional Amendment gives the gram sabha constitutional status and lists agriculture, irrigation, khadi, small-scale industry, and poverty alleviation in the Eleventh Schedule.
- Article 243A leaves the powers of the gram sabha to state law, which is why organisation is uneven.
- Balwantrai Mehta (1957) and Ashok Mehta (1978) had already asked for planning from below. The 73rd Amendment is their delayed legal form.
- State Finance Commissions and the Fourteenth Finance Commission’s local grants are meant to match functions with resources, without which resource-mapping is theatre.
Agricultural and industrial sectors
- Local identification fits watershed works, seeds, storage, and MGNREGA assets, and also rural crafts and micro-enterprise.
- Gandhi was wary of industrialism as a civilisational choice. Contemporary panchayats must still deal with agro-processing, power looms, and mineral leases that Hind Swaraj did not design.
- Gram sabha consent under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, and mining consultation, show resource identification as a veto and a plan, not as a survey for extraction only.
- Elite capture, sarpanch-pati, and un-devolved functionaries remain the gap between the sentence and Gram Swaraj.
Examination
- The quote is sound as a directive of method: organise sabhas to know and to decide on local productive resources.
- It is Gram Swaraj only if the sabha can refuse a project, not only inventory it for a department.
- Without funds, functionaries, and freedom, the 73rd Amendment’s list does not become Gandhi’s village republic.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GS[Gram Swaraj] --> SAB[Gram Sabha] SAB --> R[Identify local resources] R --> AG[Agriculture] R --> IND[Local industry khadi] AM[73rd Amendment] --> SAB
Conclusion
Panchayats with gram sabhas as local resource planners is the developmental face of Gram Swaraj. The 73rd Amendment and the Eleventh Schedule supply the legal frame. Gandhi’s swaraj is met only when the sabha is a deciding producer-community, not a mapping unit for someone else’s industry.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the entitlement theory of justice
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Did Gandhi want factories in the village?
He wanted village industries and a limit on concentrated mill civilisation, not a copy of urban heavy industry in every hamlet.
-
Is the gram sabha already a planning authority everywhere?
No. Article 243A leaves its powers to state legislatures, so practice ranges from strong assembly to a formal meeting.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the workers' movement in India in the pre-Independence period. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legislative Council is a house without any effective powers. Comment. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The Speaker represents the freedom and dignity of the House. Examine -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Ethnicity is the underlying cause which poses a great challenge in the resolution of the problems in the North-East region of India. Comment -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"The Constitution of India is a product of a historical process, rich with constitutional antecedents." Comment. -
2021 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze the Marxist perspective of the nature of Indian National Movement. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Underline the significance of the first constitutional amendment. -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Do you think that despite having significant limitations the Panchayati Raj Institutions have strengthened the process of democratic decentralization? Give your views
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach.
Political Theory
Easton treated politics as authoritative allocation inside a system of inputs, conversion, outputs, and feedback. Almond restated conversion as interest and rule functions plus political culture. The method compared new states by function, not by legal text alone. Critics charge equilibrium bias and neglect of class, ideology, and silent power. It remains a map of process, not a theory of justice.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism.
Political Theory
Cultural relativism asks that meaning be read inside a culture, against racial ranking. Boas and Herskovits are the canonical names. As method it blocks ethnocentrism; as absolute ethics it can protect domination. Parekh and Kymlicka keep culture with exit and equality. Indian minority rights sit beside Article 17, which relativism cannot erase.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence".
Political Theory
Trotsky’s revolution in permanence refuses a long bourgeois stage in late societies. Democratic and socialist tasks are chained; the process is international. The formula opposes Stalin’s socialism in one country. Marx’s 1850 phrase is the ancestor; 1905 and 1917 are the cases. The limit is neglect of peasantry, nation, and post-revolutionary law.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.