Revision summary
Cultural relativism asks that meaning be read inside a culture, against racial ranking. Boas and Herskovits are the canonical names. As method it blocks ethnocentrism; as absolute ethics it can protect domination. Parekh and Kymlicka keep culture with exit and equality. Indian minority rights sit beside Article 17, which relativism cannot erase.
Model answer
Introduction
Cultural relativism holds that practices and values must be understood inside the culture that gives them meaning. It was a reply to ranking peoples on a single civilisational ladder.
Body
The claim
- Franz Boas rejected racial hierarchy and insisted that each culture is a historical whole, not a delayed copy of Europe.
- Melville Herskovits stated cultural relativism as a method and, more strongly, as a moral warning against ethnocentric reform.
- The American Anthropological Association’s 1947 statement on human rights used this warning against a premature universal code.
- In political theory the idea challenges a single list of rights taken from Locke or Mill as if it were nature.
Politics and limit
- Relativism is a research discipline: do not judge before you can describe.
- As a political doctrine it can shield caste, gender violence, or authoritarian custom from Ambedkar’s civil equality and from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- Bhikhu Parekh and Will Kymlicka keep cultural context without surrendering exit, sex equality, and a public law of the state.
- Indian Articles 25 to 30 protect culture; Article 17 and Part III still bind custom. Relativism cannot cancel that hierarchy of norms.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CR[Cultural relativism] --> B[Boas historical cultures] CR --> H[Herskovits anti-ethnocentrism] CR --> L[Limit: rights and Article 17] U[Universal rights] --> ARG[Public argument]
Conclusion
Cultural relativism, after Boas and Herskovits, is a method against ethnocentrism. It is not a veto on human rights or on Ambedkar’s attack on caste. Description first, then a public argument about which harms a state may forbid.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Revolution in Permanence".
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does relativism mean that all cultures are equally just?
No. It means they are equally entitled to be understood. Justice is a further argument.
-
Is it the same as multiculturalism?
Multiculturalism is a citizenship policy. Relativism is a method and a moral caution that multicultural policy may use.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach. -
2022 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence". -
2022 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Bases of Power. -
2022 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's Social Contract. -
2022 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Factors like community, culture and nation weaken the hegemony of neo-liberalism today. Discuss -
2022 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Equality of estates caused equality of power, and equality of power is liberty." Comment -
2022 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Individualism is inherent in Hobbes' absolutist ideology. Comment -
2021 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Tools of legitimation of the State.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach.
Political Theory
Easton treated politics as authoritative allocation inside a system of inputs, conversion, outputs, and feedback. Almond restated conversion as interest and rule functions plus political culture. The method compared new states by function, not by legal text alone. Critics charge equilibrium bias and neglect of class, ideology, and silent power. It remains a map of process, not a theory of justice.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence".
Political Theory
Trotsky’s revolution in permanence refuses a long bourgeois stage in late societies. Democratic and socialist tasks are chained; the process is international. The formula opposes Stalin’s socialism in one country. Marx’s 1850 phrase is the ancestor; 1905 and 1917 are the cases. The limit is neglect of peasantry, nation, and post-revolutionary law.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Bases of Power.
Political Theory
A base of power is whatever enables A to affect B. Dahl locates it in observable decisions; Bachrach and Baratz in agenda; Lukes in shaped wants. Weber lists tradition, charisma, and legal-rational legitimacy. Foucault adds productive discipline and knowledge. Gramsci’s hegemony and Indian basic-structure review are further institutional bases.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.