Revision summary
Locke’s contract starts from natural rights and inconvenience, not from a war of all against all. Consent creates a community and a trustee legislature. The end is preservation of life, liberty, and estate. Betrayal of trust justifies revolution. Hobbes yields an absolute sword; Locke yields limited government.
Model answer
Introduction
John Locke in the Two Treatises of Government treats political society as a contract among persons who already have natural rights. The contract creates a trustee government, not an unlimited sovereign.
Body
The argument
- In the state of nature, persons are free and equal under natural law. Reason teaches that none may harm another in life, health, liberty, or possessions.
- Inconvenience, not Hobbesian war, is the problem: there is no known standing law, no impartial judge, and no executive power to enforce.
- People consent, expressly or tacitly, to form a community and then to set a legislature as the supreme fiduciary power.
- Government is a trust for the preservation of property in Locke’s wide sense: life, liberty, and estate.
- When the trust is betrayed, the people have a right of revolution. James II is the historical target.
Contrast
- Hobbes’s covenant yields an undivided sword; subjects retain only the right of self-preservation against immediate death.
- Rousseau’s contract creates the general will; Locke keeps majority rule inside natural-law limits and private property.
- Rawls later rebuilt contract as a hypothetical original position. Locke’s contract is more historical and proprietary.
- Indian “We, the People” and the right to constitutional remedies echo trust and limited government more than Leviathan.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[State of nature] --> R[Natural rights] R --> C[Consent and trust] C --> G[Limited government] G --> REV[Right of revolution]
Conclusion
Locke’s social contract is consent to a limited, fiduciary state that protects natural rights. It is the classic liberal alternative to Hobbesian absolutism and the ancestor of constitutional trust.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Factors like community, culture and nation weaken the hegemony of neo-liberalism today. Discuss
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did Locke support unlimited majority rule?
No. Majority is the decision rule of the community, but natural law and the trust still bind.
-
Is the Indian Preamble a Lockean contract?
It is a popular founding text of limited government. It also adds socialist and secular aims that Locke did not write.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach. -
2022 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism. -
2022 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence". -
2022 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Bases of Power. -
2022 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Factors like community, culture and nation weaken the hegemony of neo-liberalism today. Discuss -
2022 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Equality of estates caused equality of power, and equality of power is liberty." Comment -
2022 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Individualism is inherent in Hobbes' absolutist ideology. Comment -
2021 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Tools of legitimation of the State.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach.
Political Theory
Easton treated politics as authoritative allocation inside a system of inputs, conversion, outputs, and feedback. Almond restated conversion as interest and rule functions plus political culture. The method compared new states by function, not by legal text alone. Critics charge equilibrium bias and neglect of class, ideology, and silent power. It remains a map of process, not a theory of justice.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism.
Political Theory
Cultural relativism asks that meaning be read inside a culture, against racial ranking. Boas and Herskovits are the canonical names. As method it blocks ethnocentrism; as absolute ethics it can protect domination. Parekh and Kymlicka keep culture with exit and equality. Indian minority rights sit beside Article 17, which relativism cannot erase.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence".
Political Theory
Trotsky’s revolution in permanence refuses a long bourgeois stage in late societies. Democratic and socialist tasks are chained; the process is international. The formula opposes Stalin’s socialism in one country. Marx’s 1850 phrase is the ancestor; 1905 and 1917 are the cases. The limit is neglect of peasantry, nation, and post-revolutionary law.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.