Revision summary
Re-appropriating the whole NHS to SEZ and a gas plant pits two public goods against the weakest and against Parliament. Ethical issues are trust, justice, voted budget, electoral hush, and international contractual duty. Do not dump NHS; do not default on the committed tranche; do not resign as the first tool. Use supplementary grant, other uncommitted heads, and at most certified partial re-appropriation with a speaking note to the House. Resignation follows only a persisted illegal written order after dissent is recorded.
Model answer
Introduction
Two lawful public goods are fighting one envelope. Housing for the weak is not a slogan to be emptied for a ribbon. The SEZ and the gas grid are not toys. Rajesh Kumar’s duty is to keep both alive in the budget, with Parliament told the truth — not to dump the National Housing Scheme for political convenience, and not to resign as the first tool.
Body
Stakeholders
- Weaker-section households who were promised NHS houses, and the States implementing the scheme.
- The southern State and workers who would gain from the SEZ; exporters and the Commerce Ministry.
- The northern gas grid, energy security, the PSU, and M/s XYZ Hydrocarbons waiting on a contracted first tranche in December.
- Parliament, the Comptroller and Auditor General, and the taxpayer.
- The ruling political executive facing four State polls, and opposition benches who will rightly ask about NHS.
- Rajesh Kumar, his seniors, and the reputation of the Budget Division for honesty.
(a) Ethical issues in re-appropriation from NHS to development
- Public money is a trust. Both welfare housing and infrastructure are legitimate uses. Stealing the whole of one to fund the other is not “development ethics”; it is a false choice.
- Justice to the weakest: NHS is targeted at weaker sections. Emptying it after rallies have already used it as a promise is bad faith toward people who cannot lobby a Cabinet note.
- Fidelity to the voted budget: the annual allocation was Parliament’s decision. Silent, total re-appropriation treats the House as a formality.
- Transparency versus electoral convenience: four poll-bound States make delay on NHS politically explosive and also make a hush-up tempting. Ethics is disclosure, not clever timing.
- Pacta sunt servanda on the international payment: a contracted tranche to an MNC is a legal and reputational duty. Default is not a moral high ground; it is another broken public promise.
- Land already with the PSU and Cabinet approval of the SEZ mean sunk public process. Ignoring that waste is also a utilisation failure.
- Conflict of interest of the political calendar: “process immediately” can mean “hide the NHS hole until after voting.” That is an illegal oral colour on a budget file.
- Equity between regions: a southern SEZ and a northern grid versus a national housing list — the ethic is a speaking, numbered split, not a winner-take-all.
- Utilisation: money sitting idle is wrong; money raided from a live welfare scheme to look like utilisation of a prestige project is also wrong.
- Integrity of the officer: signing a total diversion he knows will stall NHS, without alternatives on the note, makes him a co-author of the broken house.
(b) Options; resignation is not the first tool
- Option 1: Recommend re-appropriation of the entire Rs 6000 crore from NHS, as asked, with a thin note.
- Merit: seniors are pleased; December payment is safe; SEZ land process continues.
- Demerit: NHS is gutted after only Rs 775 crore is drawn; Parliament is blindsided; weaker sections pay for a political convenience. Rejected.
- Option 2: Refuse any money to SEZ and the gas plant, “protect the poor,” and let the MNC tranche slip.
- Merit: looks pro-welfare.
- Demerit: contractual default, possible damages, energy-security delay, and waste of a Cabinet-approved SEZ. Welfare is not a licence to break lawful development commitments. Rejected as the sole path.
- Option 3: Resign at once so that someone else signs.
- Merit: personal cleanliness theatre.
- Demerit: the next incumbent may be more pliant; the file still needs a constitutional officer; resignation without a recorded alternative is abandonment. Not worthy as the first or main option. It becomes worthy only if an illegal written order is insisted upon after every lawful path is refused on paper.
- Option 4: Supplementary grant / additional budget, re-prioritisation from non-committed heads, or market borrowing within FRBM and Cabinet-Parliament process, so that NHS is not the piggy bank.
- Merit: both objects can live; the House votes the extra.
- Demerit: time, Cabinet bandwidth, and fiscal space. Still the cleanest money.
- Option 5: Phased or partial re-appropriation from NHS only of what will not be spent this year, with a published phasing of housing, plus full financing of the December international payment from a ring-fenced source, and a speaking note to Parliament.
- Merit: protects legally committed payment; does not dump the housing scheme; tells the truth.
- Demerit: some NHS delay may remain; that delay must be quantified, compensated in the next schedule, and not used as a quiet kill.
- Option 6: Leak to the press first.
- Merit: sunlight.
- Demerit: budget secrets, market panic, and trial of a file that should go to the Finance Minister and the House. Media after the note is upstairs, not instead of it.
Most appropriate course
- Do not recommend dumping the entire NHS allocation. Record that Rs 8300 crore was a voted welfare commitment and that only Rs 775 crore drawn does not prove the rest is surplus — it may prove slow administrative drawal that the Ministry must accelerate, not confiscate.
- Protect the December payment to M/s XYZ Hydrocarbons as a legally committed international obligation: identify a lawful source that is not a silent death of NHS.
- Put on file a menu: supplementary grant; savings from uncommitted, non-welfare heads; partial re-appropriation limited to independently certified NHS underspend; and a phased SEZ cash plan that matches land and clearances actually ready.
- Insist on Parliament disclosure: re-appropriation and supplementary demands are not private bargains among seniors. Difficult questions in the House are a feature of democracy, not a reason to hide.
- Tell seniors in writing that “politically sensitive” does not authorise a false utilisation story before four State elections.
- If ordered orally to strip NHS in full, ask for a written order, offer the lawful menu again, and if the written order is illegal, refuse under Conduct Rules and the Constitution’s budget scheme; only then consider resignation after the dissent is on the record and copied to the competent authority.
- Public money: welfare and development both. The ethical officer is the one who keeps both in the light.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FILE[Rs 6000 crore demand] --> NOTALL[Refuse full NHS dump] NOTALL --> SUP[Supplementary / other heads] NOTALL --> PART[Partial phased with disclosure] NOTALL --> PAY[Protect December MNC payment] DUMP[Entire NHS raid] --> BF[Bad faith to weaker sections] RES[Resign first] --> VAC[Pliant successor]
Conclusion
Total raid on NHS is a betrayal of the weak and of the voted budget. Default on the MNC tranche is a second betrayal. Rajesh Kumar should finance the committed payment, keep housing alive through supplementary or honest partial means, disclose to Parliament, and treat resignation as last dissent, not as the opening move.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. The Chairman of Bharat Missiles Ltd (BML) was watching a program on TV wherein the Prime Minister was addressing the nation on the necessity of developing a self-reliant India. He subconsciously nodded in agreement and smiled to himself as he mentally reviewed BML's journey in the past two decades. BML had admirably progressed from producing first generation anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMS) to designing and producing state of the art ATGM weapon systems that would be the envy of any army. He sighed in reconciliation with his assumptions that the government would probably not alter the status quo of a ban on export of military weaponry. To his surprise, the very next day he got a telephone call from the Director General, Ministry of Defence, asking him to discuss the modalities of increasing BML production of ATGMS as there is a possibility of exporting the same to a friendly foreign country. The Director General wanted the Chairman to discuss the details with his staff at Delhi next week. Two days later, at a press conference, the Defence Minister stated that he aims to double the current weapons export levels within five years. This would give an impetus to financing the development and manufacture of indigenous weapons in the country. He also stated that all indigenous arms manufacturing nations have a very good record of international arms trade. As Chairman of BML, what are your views on the following points? (a) As an arms exporter of a responsible nation like India, what are the ethical issues involved in arms trade? (b) List five ethical factors that would influence the decision to sell arms to foreign governments.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q8). View answer →
-
If seniors say process immediately, must Rajesh sign the full diversion?
He must process immediately with a lawful menu and a warning on NHS. Speed is not the same as stripping a welfare vote.
-
Is protecting the MNC payment anti-poor?
No. Energy security and a kept contract are public goods. Anti-poor is using that truth to erase housing instead of finding a second rupee.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. The Chairman of Bharat Missiles Ltd (BML) was watching a program on TV wherein the Prime Minister was addressing the nation on the necessity of developing a self-reliant India. He subconsciously nodded in agreement and smiled to himself as he mentally reviewed BML's journey in the past two decades. BML had admirably progressed from producing first generation anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMS) to designing and producing state of the art ATGM weapon systems that would be the envy of any army. He sighed in reconciliation with his assumptions that the government would probably not alter the status quo of a ban on export of military weaponry. To his surprise, the very next day he got a telephone call from the Director General, Ministry of Defence, asking him to discuss the modalities of increasing BML production of ATGMS as there is a possibility of exporting the same to a friendly foreign country. The Director General wanted the Chairman to discuss the details with his staff at Delhi next week. Two days later, at a press conference, the Defence Minister stated that he aims to double the current weapons export levels within five years. This would give an impetus to financing the development and manufacture of indigenous weapons in the country. He also stated that all indigenous arms manufacturing nations have a very good record of international arms trade. As Chairman of BML, what are your views on the following points? (a) As an arms exporter of a responsible nation like India, what are the ethical issues involved in arms trade? (b) List five ethical factors that would influence the decision to sell arms to foreign governments. -
2020 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rampura, a remote district inhabited by a tribal population, is marked by extreme backwardness and abject poverty. Agriculture is the mainstay of the local population, though it is primarily subsistence due to the very small land holdings. There is insignificant industrial or mining activity. Even the targeted welfare programs have inadequately benefited the tribal population. In this restrictive scenario, the youth has begun to migrate to other states to supplement the family income. Plight of minor girls is that their parents are persuaded by labour contractors to send them to work in the Bt Cotton farms of a nearby state. The soft fingers of the minor girls are well suited for plucking the cotton. The inadequate living and working conditions in these farms have caused serious health issues for the minor girls. NGOs in the districts of domicile and the cotton farms appear to be compromised and have not effectively espoused the twin issues of child labour and development of the area. You are appointed as the District Collector of Rampura. Identify the ethical issues involved. Which specific steps will you initiate to ameliorate the conditions of minor girls of your district and to improve the over-all economic scenario in the district? -
2020 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are a municipal commissioner of a large city, having the reputation of a very honest and upright officer. A huge multipurpose mall is under construction in your city in which a large number of daily wage earners are employed. One night, during monsoons, a big chunk of the roof collapsed causing instant death of four labourers including two minors. Many more were seriously injured requiring immediate medical attention. The mishap resulted in a big hue and cry, forcing the government to institute an enquiry. Your preliminary enquiry has revealed a series of anomalies. The material used for the construction was of poor quality. Despite the approved building plans permitting only one basement, an additional basement has been constructed. This was overlooked during the periodic inspections by the building inspector of the municipal corporation. In your enquiry, you noticed that the construction of the mall was given the green signal despite encroaching on areas earmarked for a green belt and a slip road in the Zonal Master Plan of the city. The permission to construct the mall was accorded by the previous Municipal Commissioner who is not only your senior and well known to you professionally, but also a good friend. Prima facie, the case appears to be of a widespread nexus between officials of the Municipal Corporation and the builders. Your colleagues are putting pressure on you to go slow in the enquiry. The builder, who is rich and influential, happens to be a close relative of a powerful minister in the state cabinet. The builder is persuading you to hush up the matter, promising you a fortune to do so. He also hinted that if this matter is not resolved at the earliest in his favour there is somebody in his office who is waiting to file a case against you under the POSH Act. Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. What are the options available to you in this situation? Explain your selected course of action. -
2020 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Parmal is a small but underdeveloped district. It has rocky terrain that is not suitable for agriculture, though some subsistence agriculture is being done on small plots of land. The area receives adequate rainfall and has an irrigation canal flowing through it. Amria, its administrative centre, is a medium sized town. It houses a large district hospital, an Industrial Training Institute and some privately owned skill training centres. It has all the facilities of a district headquarters. A trunk railway line passes approximately 50 kilometres from Amria. Its poor connectivity is a major reason for the absence of any major industry therein. The state government offers a 10 years tax holiday as an incentive to new industry. In 2010 Anil, an industrialist, decided to take benefits to set up Amria Plastic Works (APW) in Noora village, about 20 km from Amria. While the factory was being built, Anil hired the required key labour and got them trained at the skill training centres at Amria. This act of his made the key personnel very loyal to APW. APW started production in 2011 with the labour drawn fully from Noora village. The villagers were very happy to get employment near their homes and were motivated by the key personnel to meet the production targets with high quality. APW started making large profits, a sizeable portion of which was used to improve the quality of life in Noora. By 2016, Noora could boast of a greener village and a renovated village temple. Anil liaised with the local MLA to increase the frequency of the bus services to Amria. The government also opened a primary health care centre and primary school at Noora in buildings constructed by APW. APW used its CSR funds to set up women's self-help groups, subsidize primary education to the village children and procure an ambulance for use by its employees and the needy. In 2019, there was a minor fire in APW. It was quickly extinguished as fire safety protocols were in place in the factory. Investigations revealed that the factory had been using electricity in excess of its authorized capacity. This was soon rectified. The next year, due to a nationwide lockdown, the requirement of production fell for four months. Anil decided that all employees would be paid regularly. He employed them to plant trees and improve the village habitat. APW had developed a reputation of high-quality production and a motivated workforce. Critically analyse the story of APW and state the ethical issues involved. Do you consider APW as a role model for development of backward areas? Give reasons. -
2020 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Migrant workers have always remained at the socio-economic margins of our society, silently serving as the instrumental labour force of urban economics. The pandemic has brought them into national focus. On announcement of a countrywide lockdown, a very large number of migrant workers decided to move back from their places of employment to their native villages. The non-availability of transport created its own problems. Added to this was the fear of starvation and inconvenience to their families. This caused the migrant workers to demand wages and transport facilities for returning to their villages. Their mental agony was accentuated by multiple factors such as a sudden loss of livelihood, possibility of lack of food and inability to assist in harvesting their rabi crop due to not being able to reach home in time. Reports of inadequate response of some districts in providing the essential boarding and lodging arrangements along the way multiplied their fears. You have learnt many lessons from this situation when you were tasked to oversee the functioning of the District Disaster Relief Force in your district. In your opinion what ethical issues arose in the current migrant crisis? What do you understand by an ethical care giving state? What assistance can the civil society render to mitigate the sufferings of migrants in similar situations? -
2019 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. An apparel manufacturing company having a large number of women employees was losing sales due to various factors. The company hired a reputed marketing executive, who increased the volume of sales within a short span of time. However, some unconfirmed reports came up regarding his indulgence in sexual harassment at the workplace. After some time a woman employee launched a formal complaint to the management against the marketing executive about sexually harassing her. Faced with the companies' indifference, in not taking cognizance of her grievances, she lodged an FIR with the police. Realizing the sensitivity and gravity of the situation, the company called the woman employee to negotiate. In that, she was offered a hefty sum of money to withdraw the complaint and the FIR and also give in writing that the marketing executive is not involved in the case. Identify the ethical issues involved in this case. What options are available to the woman employee? -
2019 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive. Elected people's representatives form the political executive and bureaucracy forms the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executive and the political executive were characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other's domain. However, in the subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executive to follow its agenda. Respect for an appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting, etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards 'politicization of bureaucracy'. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life have also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive. What are the consequences of this 'politicization of bureaucracy'? Discuss. -
2019 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In one of the districts of a frontier state, narcotics menace has been rampant. This has resulted in money laundering, mushrooming of poppy farming, arms smuggling, and near stalling of education. The system is on the verge of collapse. The situation has been further worsened by unconfirmed reports that local politicians as well as some senior police officers are providing surreptitious patronage to the drug mafia. At that point of time a woman police officer, known for her skills in handling such situations is appointed as superintendent of police to bring the situation to normalcy. If you are the same police officer, identify the various dimensions of the crisis. Based on your understanding, suggest measures to deal with the crisis.
More from this topic
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil war situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near own border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties has increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, in one night Ashok got information from the local police guarding the border check post that there are about 200-250 people mainly women and children trying to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?(b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?(c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?(d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?
Ethics Case Studies
Options range from pushing everyone back to opening the gate to armed men; both extremes fail. The dilemma is non-refoulement and medical duty versus sovereignty and the risk of a ruse. The better path is triage and shelter for civilians, especially women and children, and separate internment of disarmed soldiers pending the Centre. Border police should keep distance, seal weapons, separate camps, and avoid humiliation or leaks. Waiting for a dead phone while a child bleeds is not caution; it is omission.
Q11 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Program, MGNREGA was earlier known as National Rural Employment Scheme, NREGA. It is an Indian Social Welfare Program that aimed at fulfilling the 'Right to Work' provisions made in the Constitution. MGNREGA was launched in 2006 under Rural Employment Sector by the Ministry of Rural Development. Main objective of the program is to give legal guarantee of wage employment to the adult members of rural households who are willing to do unskilled manual labour work subject to a maximum of 100 days per year for every household. Every rural household has the right to register under the scheme, job card is issued to the registered, Job Card holder can seek employment; State Government shall pay 25% of minimum wage for the first 30 days as compensatory daily unemployment allowance to the families and of wage for remaining period of the year. MGNREGA work was undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You have been appointed as an Administrator Incharge of the District. You have been given the responsibility of monitoring MGNREGA work undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You are also given the authority to give technical sanctions to all MGNREGA works. In one of the Panchayats in your jurisdiction, you notice that your predecessor has mismanaged the Program in terms of: (i) Money not disbursed to actual job-seekers.(ii) Muster Rolls of the Labourers not properly maintained.(iii) Mismatch between the work done and payments made.(iv) Payments made to fictitious persons.(v) Job Cards were given without looking into the need of person.(vi) Mismanagement of funds and to the extent of siphoning of funds.(vii) Approved works that never existed. (a) What is your reaction to the above situation and how do you restore the proper functioning of MGNREGA Program in this regard?(b) What actions would you initiate, to solve the various issues listed above?(c) How would you deal with the above situation?
Ethics Case Studies
The first duty is to protect records, tell workers the truth, and stop further theft. Arrears must reach real job-seekers while ghosts, fake works and siphoned funds go to vigilance and the police. Job cards should be re-verified without stripping genuine households. The predecessor deserves due process, not a media hanging or a cover-up. Social audit, geotagging and a public dashboard keep the repair from rotting again.
Q10 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set-back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer-related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation?(b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case?(c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why?
Ethics Case Studies
Splitting ₹35 lakh into smaller bills to avoid the boss’s sanction is a GFR violation, even if it is a common trick. The ethical issues are career fear, a named vendor, and the habit of collective cheating. Rajesh’s options include splitting, lawful phasing, written illegal orders, or a proper sanction. The right choice is a single proposal to the competent authority and a competitive purchase. A promotion that needs a false indent is not worth the integrity it costs.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.