Revision summary
Calling off rescue after an assault would abandon thousands and confirm State flight. The response is to treat the injured, add protection and local faces, speak honestly, and restart relief. Lawful doors are the Disaster Management Act, 2005, NDRF/SDRF, SDRF money and PDS grain on written order. Assault can be prosecuted later; mass revenge on survivors is wrong. Needed qualities: compassion, courage, EQ, impartiality, communication and care for the team.
Model answer
Introduction
You lead rescue in a disaster where homes, food and water are gone, rain has cut the roads, and angry survivors have beaten your team, one of them badly. Some colleagues want to stop. The duty is still the living; the method must also keep the rescuers alive.
Body
Stakeholders
- Survivors without shelter, food, and drinking water.
- Your team, including the severely injured member and those who want to withdraw.
- Local leaders, rumour-spreaders, and the people whose anger is real because delay was real.
- The State disaster machinery: District Magistrate, NDRF, SDRF, police, and health.
- You as incident commander under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Ethical issues
- Duty to rescue versus duty of care to one’s own team.
- Public anger that is understandable after delay, and violence that is still a crime.
- Fair allocation of scarce food and water when every hand pulls.
- Values: compassion, courage, perseverance, impartiality, selflessness, and emotional intelligence.
Options
- Option 1: Call off operations and pull everyone out.
- Merit: stops further injury to the team today.
- Demerit: abandons thousands; confirms the rumour that the State fled; more deaths by night.
- Option 2: Order the team to march in without protection or explanation, matching anger with force.
- Merit: looks tough.
- Demerit: more lathis, more injured staff, and a riot on a floodplain.
- Option 3: Freeze until the rain stops and the road is perfect.
- Merit: textbook logistics.
- Demerit: the stem already says delay is the wound; waiting is a second abandonment.
- Option 4: Stay, reconfigure, and continue rescue with security, communication, and care for the injured — the chosen path.
- Merit: both lives: survivors and staff.
- Demerit: residual risk that must be named and mitigated, not denied.
Response (reasoned action)
- Do not call off the operation. Evacuate the severely injured to the nearest working hospital with an escort, and record the assault for later criminal process; do not start a revenge round now.
- Pause only the exposed cluster that was beaten. Pull the team to a defensible edge, not out of the district.
- Ask the District Magistrate and police for a protection ring and for local respected persons — a teacher, a sarpanch, a faith leader — to walk with the next column so the crowd sees neighbours, not only uniforms.
- Speak to the crowd in their language: admit the delay, name the rain and the broken road, announce the next water and food drop time, and ask them to name the sick first. Anger often falls when a list appears.
- Restart supply by whatever lawful means the Disaster Management Act, 2005 allows: air-drop if the State can, porters, boats, and opening PDS or mid-day-meal grain with a written order so that feeding is not a loot.
- Lawful doors: National Disaster Response Force and State Disaster Response Force; the State Disaster Response Fund; the National Disaster Management Authority’s incident-response system; Aapda Mitra volunteers if trained locally; and the public distribution system as emergency food.
- Separate criminal assault from hungry grief. A few who beat rescuers can be identified on video later; mass punishment of the camp is unethical and stupid.
- Rotate exhausted staff; do not shame those who felt fear. Fear named is EQ; fear that empties the field is failure of command, not of the constable who spoke.
- Keep a public board of who got tents and water so that impartiality is visible.
Qualities of a public servant required
- Compassion that stays: the crowd’s anger is data about suffering, not a licence to hate them.
- Courage that is not theatre: walk back in with a plan, not with a speech alone.
- Perseverance when rain and rumour both continue.
- Emotional intelligence: hold one’s own anger after a colleague is hurt; do not let it become a massacre of a camp.
- Decisiveness: a clear order — we continue, with these changes — so the team is not a debate club in a flood.
- Integrity and impartiality in relief lists, including for groups the crowd dislikes.
- Communication: truth about what will arrive at 4 p.m., not a comfort lie.
- Team care: a leader who treats the injured as a duty, not as a nuisance to the mission.
- Coordination: the humility to use NDRF, health, and local volunteers rather than a solo hero file.
- Accountability: a night log that a later inquiry can read, because disasters attract blame as surely as they attract cameras.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CAL[Calamity and assault] --> NO[Do not abandon] NO --> CARE[Evacuate injured] NO --> SEC[Protection and local leaders] SEC --> REL[Food water shelter] REL --> PDS[PDS NDRF SDRF] ANGER[Crowd anger] --> TALK[Truth and relief list]
Conclusion
Do not abandon the field. Protect and treat the injured, add a security and local-leader ring, tell the truth about delay, and restart food, water and shelter through NDRF, SDRF, SDRF funds and PDS. The qualities required are compassion, courage, EQ, impartiality and perseverance — duty to survivors without sacrificing the team as a second casualty.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. Honesty and uprightness are the hallmarks of a civil servant. Civil servants possessing these qualities are considered as the backbone of any strong organization. In the line of duty, they take various decisions, at times some become bonafide mistakes. As long as such decisions are not taken intentionally and do not benefit personally, the officer cannot be said to be guilty. Though such decisions may, at times, lead to unforeseen adverse consequences in the long term. In the recent past, a few instances have surfaced wherein civil servants have been implicated for bonafide mistakes. They have often been prosecuted and even imprisoned. The instances have greatly rattled the moral fiber of the civil servants. How does this trend affect the functioning of civil services? What measures can be taken to ensure the honest civil servants are not implicated for the bonafide mistakes on their part? Justify your answer.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q12). View answer →
-
If the team’s life is at risk, is withdrawal still forbidden?
A tactical pull-back of an exposed group is allowed. Leaving the district because of fear, while thousands remain without water, is not.
-
Should you fire on the crowd that beat your colleague?
No. Isolate assailants later by evidence. A relief camp is not a battlefield, and your next water tanker still has to enter that crowd.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. An apparel manufacturing company having a large number of women employees was losing sales due to various factors. The company hired a reputed marketing executive, who increased the volume of sales within a short span of time. However, some unconfirmed reports came up regarding his indulgence in sexual harassment at the workplace. After some time a woman employee launched a formal complaint to the management against the marketing executive about sexually harassing her. Faced with the companies' indifference, in not taking cognizance of her grievances, she lodged an FIR with the police. Realizing the sensitivity and gravity of the situation, the company called the woman employee to negotiate. In that, she was offered a hefty sum of money to withdraw the complaint and the FIR and also give in writing that the marketing executive is not involved in the case. Identify the ethical issues involved in this case. What options are available to the woman employee? -
2019 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive. Elected people's representatives form the political executive and bureaucracy forms the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executive and the political executive were characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other's domain. However, in the subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executive to follow its agenda. Respect for an appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting, etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards 'politicization of bureaucracy'. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life have also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive. What are the consequences of this 'politicization of bureaucracy'? Discuss. -
2019 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In one of the districts of a frontier state, narcotics menace has been rampant. This has resulted in money laundering, mushrooming of poppy farming, arms smuggling, and near stalling of education. The system is on the verge of collapse. The situation has been further worsened by unconfirmed reports that local politicians as well as some senior police officers are providing surreptitious patronage to the drug mafia. At that point of time a woman police officer, known for her skills in handling such situations is appointed as superintendent of police to bring the situation to normalcy. If you are the same police officer, identify the various dimensions of the crisis. Based on your understanding, suggest measures to deal with the crisis. -
2019 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In recent times, there has been an increasing concern in India to develop effective civil service ethics, code of conduct, transparency measures, ethics and integrity systems, and anti-corruption agencies. In view of this, there is a need being felt to focus on three specific areas, which are directly relevant to the problems of internalizing integrity and ethics in civil services. These are as follows: Anticipating specific threats to ethical standards and integrity in the civil services, Strengthening the ethical competence of civil servants, and Developing administrative processes and practices which promote ethical values and integrity in civil services. Suggest institutional measures to address the above three issues. -
2019 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Honesty and uprightness are the hallmarks of a civil servant. Civil servants possessing these qualities are considered as the backbone of any strong organization. In the line of duty, they take various decisions, at times some become bonafide mistakes. As long as such decisions are not taken intentionally and do not benefit personally, the officer cannot be said to be guilty. Though such decisions may, at times, lead to unforeseen adverse consequences in the long term. In the recent past, a few instances have surfaced wherein civil servants have been implicated for bonafide mistakes. They have often been prosecuted and even imprisoned. The instances have greatly rattled the moral fiber of the civil servants. How does this trend affect the functioning of civil services? What measures can be taken to ensure the honest civil servants are not implicated for the bonafide mistakes on their part? Justify your answer. -
2018 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Edward Snowden, a computer expert, and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his "whistleblowing" by stating that he had a duty "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them." According to Snowden, the Government's violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden's actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case. (250 words). -
2018 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh is a responsible district-level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words). -
2018 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. It is a State where prohibition is in force. You are recently appointed as the Superintendent of Police of a district notorious for illicit distillation of liquor. The illicit liquor leads to many death, reported and unreported, and causes a major problem for the district authorities. The approach till now had been to view it as a law and order problem and tackle it accordingly. Raids, arrests, police cases, and criminal trials - all these had only limited impact. The problem remains as serious as ever. Your inspections show that the parts of the district where the distillation flourishes are economically, industrially, and educationally backward. Agriculture is badly affected by poor irrigation facilities. Frequent clashes among communities gave a boost to illicit distillation. No major initiatives had taken place in the past either from the government's side or from social organizations to improve a lot of the people. Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control? (250 words).
More from this topic
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil war situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near own border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties has increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, in one night Ashok got information from the local police guarding the border check post that there are about 200-250 people mainly women and children trying to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?(b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?(c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?(d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?
Ethics Case Studies
Options range from pushing everyone back to opening the gate to armed men; both extremes fail. The dilemma is non-refoulement and medical duty versus sovereignty and the risk of a ruse. The better path is triage and shelter for civilians, especially women and children, and separate internment of disarmed soldiers pending the Centre. Border police should keep distance, seal weapons, separate camps, and avoid humiliation or leaks. Waiting for a dead phone while a child bleeds is not caution; it is omission.
Q11 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Program, MGNREGA was earlier known as National Rural Employment Scheme, NREGA. It is an Indian Social Welfare Program that aimed at fulfilling the 'Right to Work' provisions made in the Constitution. MGNREGA was launched in 2006 under Rural Employment Sector by the Ministry of Rural Development. Main objective of the program is to give legal guarantee of wage employment to the adult members of rural households who are willing to do unskilled manual labour work subject to a maximum of 100 days per year for every household. Every rural household has the right to register under the scheme, job card is issued to the registered, Job Card holder can seek employment; State Government shall pay 25% of minimum wage for the first 30 days as compensatory daily unemployment allowance to the families and of wage for remaining period of the year. MGNREGA work was undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You have been appointed as an Administrator Incharge of the District. You have been given the responsibility of monitoring MGNREGA work undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You are also given the authority to give technical sanctions to all MGNREGA works. In one of the Panchayats in your jurisdiction, you notice that your predecessor has mismanaged the Program in terms of: (i) Money not disbursed to actual job-seekers.(ii) Muster Rolls of the Labourers not properly maintained.(iii) Mismatch between the work done and payments made.(iv) Payments made to fictitious persons.(v) Job Cards were given without looking into the need of person.(vi) Mismanagement of funds and to the extent of siphoning of funds.(vii) Approved works that never existed. (a) What is your reaction to the above situation and how do you restore the proper functioning of MGNREGA Program in this regard?(b) What actions would you initiate, to solve the various issues listed above?(c) How would you deal with the above situation?
Ethics Case Studies
The first duty is to protect records, tell workers the truth, and stop further theft. Arrears must reach real job-seekers while ghosts, fake works and siphoned funds go to vigilance and the police. Job cards should be re-verified without stripping genuine households. The predecessor deserves due process, not a media hanging or a cover-up. Social audit, geotagging and a public dashboard keep the repair from rotting again.
Q10 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set-back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer-related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation?(b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case?(c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why?
Ethics Case Studies
Splitting ₹35 lakh into smaller bills to avoid the boss’s sanction is a GFR violation, even if it is a common trick. The ethical issues are career fear, a named vendor, and the habit of collective cheating. Rajesh’s options include splitting, lawful phasing, written illegal orders, or a proper sanction. The right choice is a single proposal to the competent authority and a competitive purchase. A promotion that needs a false indent is not worth the integrity it costs.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.