Revision summary
Dimensions include organised crime, laundering, alleged political and police patronage, addiction and dead schools. A woman SP must first secure a leaky force and refuse private political advice. Do not only crush poor poppy growers or leak unconfirmed names. Pair NDPS action with treatment (Nasha Mukt Bharat), school protection (Samagra Shiksha) and PMLA trails for patrons. Success is a reopened school and a fair independent inquiry, not a headline raid.
Model answer
Introduction
A frontier district is collapsing under narcotics, laundering, poppy, arms, and empty schools. Unconfirmed reports say local politicians and some senior police protect the mafia. You take charge as Superintendent of Police. The task is to name the crisis fully and to act without becoming either a crusader without law or a guest of the cartel.
Body
Stakeholders
- Children and parents whose schools have stalled; addicts who need treatment, not only handcuffs.
- Farmers tempted into poppy; transporters and small traders caught in laundering.
- Honest constables and the few clean officers who will be your only spine.
- Local politicians, some of whom may be patrons; the ones who are not must still be kept on the lawful side of the table.
- Senior police named in rumours; the State government; narcotics and financial-intelligence agencies.
- Across the frontier: communities who will pay if you start a war without a hospital and a school behind you.
Dimensions of the crisis
- Law-and-order dimension: arms smuggling and mafia violence, so ordinary policing has already lost the street.
- Criminal-economy dimension: poppy, heroin or other narcotics, and money laundering that can buy a booth and a posting.
- Governance dimension: alleged patronage by politicians and senior police, which means the organ meant to cut the tumour may be feeding it.
- Social dimension: addiction, dropouts, and a generation that sees the teacher as weaker than the peddler.
- Gender and safety dimension: a woman SP in a militarised narcotics belt faces both the cartel and a force that may test her authority.
- Intelligence dimension: reports are unconfirmed; a false raid on a rival of the mafia would make you their tool.
- Federal and border dimension: a frontier crime is rarely only a district crime; agencies and neighbouring jurisdictions matter.
- Ethical dimension: courage versus survival; impartiality versus the patron who posted you; compassion for addicts versus a war on the poor farmer only.
Options
- Option 1: Immediate spectacular raids on the poor poppy fringe, while leaving alleged patrons untouched.
- Merit: television.
- Demerit: you crush the weak, confirm the mafia’s protection, and lose the village.
- Option 2: Wait for written proof of every patron before any arrest.
- Merit: caution.
- Demerit: the district finishes collapsing while you polish a file.
- Option 3: Go public with names of politicians and seniors on unconfirmed reports.
- Merit: fear.
- Demerit: defamation, a transfer by morning, and a ruined trial.
- Option 4: Build a lawful, layered campaign: verify, hit the logistics, protect schools, treat addicts, and send patronage leads to independent agencies while you secure your own force.
- Merit: law, legitimacy, and a chance of lasting order.
- Demerit: slower headlines; you will need State cover.
Measures (reasoned action)
- Secure the force first: identify compromised officers, mix duties, use outside contingents for sensitive raids, and put your own movements on a need-to-know map. A woman SP must also enforce a zero-tolerance line on internal harassment so the force does not leak her plans as gossip.
- Verify before you brand. Treat patronage reports as intelligence: surveillance, financial trails, and the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 route through the Enforcement Directorate where facts fit, not as a press note.
- Use the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for supply, but separate the addicted user toward treatment. Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan and State de-addiction centres are the lawful health door so that policing is not only a body count.
- Hit arms and intercepts with the Arms Act, 1959 and, if the case is inter-State or organised, seek the State’s nod for specialised agencies rather than a lone-hero file.
- Restore education as a security measure: protect schools, run enrolment drives with the district education officer, and use Samagra Shiksha so a child has a daytime alternative to the cartel’s errand.
- Give farmers a lawful crop and credit door with the district agriculture officer and existing schemes, so destruction of poppy is paired with a living, not only a burning.
- Keep politicians at a public, minuted meeting on peace and schools; do not take private envelopes of “advice”. If a minister issues an illegal oral order, record a written note and inform the Director General of Police.
- Witness protection, in-camera statements, and fast-track production of seized samples to the forensic lab so cases do not die in the malkhana.
- Values to hold: justice, courage, impartiality, compassion for the addict and the child, and humility about unconfirmed reports.
- You succeed when a school reopens, a clean constable is not transferred as punishment, and a patron is inquired by a competent independent body — not when you become a slogan.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CR[Narcotics and arms] --> DIM[Crime money patronage schools] DIM --> VER[Verify intelligence] VER --> HIT[NDPS and logistics hits] HIT --> HEALTH[Nasha Mukt treatment] HIT --> SCH[Protect and reopen schools] PAT[Patronage leads] --> IND[Independent agencies]
Conclusion
The crisis is crime, money, captured policing, and a stalled childhood at once. Raid the logistics, not only the poor fringe; treat addicts; protect schools; and send patronage trails to independent financial and vigilance agencies. Lawful doors include the NDPS Act, PMLA, Nasha Mukt Bharat and Samagra Shiksha.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. In recent times, there has been an increasing concern in India to develop effective civil service ethics, code of conduct, transparency measures, ethics and integrity systems, and anti-corruption agencies. In view of this, there is a need being felt to focus on three specific areas, which are directly relevant to the problems of internalizing integrity and ethics in civil services. These are as follows: Anticipating specific threats to ethical standards and integrity in the civil services, Strengthening the ethical competence of civil servants, and Developing administrative processes and practices which promote ethical values and integrity in civil services. Suggest institutional measures to address the above three issues.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q10). View answer →
-
Should you arrest a named politician on day one from rumours?
No. Convert rumours into evidence and let a competent independent agency take the political height if the facts reach there. A reckless arrest can destroy the case and the district.
-
Is destroying poppy enough?
No. Without treatment, schools and a legal crop, the plant returns and the mafia looks like the only employer.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. An apparel manufacturing company having a large number of women employees was losing sales due to various factors. The company hired a reputed marketing executive, who increased the volume of sales within a short span of time. However, some unconfirmed reports came up regarding his indulgence in sexual harassment at the workplace. After some time a woman employee launched a formal complaint to the management against the marketing executive about sexually harassing her. Faced with the companies' indifference, in not taking cognizance of her grievances, she lodged an FIR with the police. Realizing the sensitivity and gravity of the situation, the company called the woman employee to negotiate. In that, she was offered a hefty sum of money to withdraw the complaint and the FIR and also give in writing that the marketing executive is not involved in the case. Identify the ethical issues involved in this case. What options are available to the woman employee? -
2019 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive. Elected people's representatives form the political executive and bureaucracy forms the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executive and the political executive were characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other's domain. However, in the subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executive to follow its agenda. Respect for an appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting, etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards 'politicization of bureaucracy'. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life have also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive. What are the consequences of this 'politicization of bureaucracy'? Discuss. -
2019 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In recent times, there has been an increasing concern in India to develop effective civil service ethics, code of conduct, transparency measures, ethics and integrity systems, and anti-corruption agencies. In view of this, there is a need being felt to focus on three specific areas, which are directly relevant to the problems of internalizing integrity and ethics in civil services. These are as follows: Anticipating specific threats to ethical standards and integrity in the civil services, Strengthening the ethical competence of civil servants, and Developing administrative processes and practices which promote ethical values and integrity in civil services. Suggest institutional measures to address the above three issues. -
2019 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are heading the rescue operations in an area affected by severe natural calamity. Thousands of people are rendered homeless and deprived of food, drinking water, and other basic amenities. Rescue work has been disrupted by heavy rainfall and damage to supply routes. The local people are seething with anger against the delayed limited rescue operations. When your team reaches the affected area, the people there heckle and even assault some of the team members. One of your team members is even severely injured. Faced with this crisis, some team members plead with you to call off the operations fearing threats to their life. In such trying circumstances, what will be your response? Examine the qualities of a public servant which will be required to manage the situation. -
2019 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Honesty and uprightness are the hallmarks of a civil servant. Civil servants possessing these qualities are considered as the backbone of any strong organization. In the line of duty, they take various decisions, at times some become bonafide mistakes. As long as such decisions are not taken intentionally and do not benefit personally, the officer cannot be said to be guilty. Though such decisions may, at times, lead to unforeseen adverse consequences in the long term. In the recent past, a few instances have surfaced wherein civil servants have been implicated for bonafide mistakes. They have often been prosecuted and even imprisoned. The instances have greatly rattled the moral fiber of the civil servants. How does this trend affect the functioning of civil services? What measures can be taken to ensure the honest civil servants are not implicated for the bonafide mistakes on their part? Justify your answer. -
2018 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Edward Snowden, a computer expert, and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his "whistleblowing" by stating that he had a duty "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them." According to Snowden, the Government's violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden's actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case. (250 words). -
2018 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh is a responsible district-level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words). -
2018 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. It is a State where prohibition is in force. You are recently appointed as the Superintendent of Police of a district notorious for illicit distillation of liquor. The illicit liquor leads to many death, reported and unreported, and causes a major problem for the district authorities. The approach till now had been to view it as a law and order problem and tackle it accordingly. Raids, arrests, police cases, and criminal trials - all these had only limited impact. The problem remains as serious as ever. Your inspections show that the parts of the district where the distillation flourishes are economically, industrially, and educationally backward. Agriculture is badly affected by poor irrigation facilities. Frequent clashes among communities gave a boost to illicit distillation. No major initiatives had taken place in the past either from the government's side or from social organizations to improve a lot of the people. Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control? (250 words).
More from this topic
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil war situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near own border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties has increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, in one night Ashok got information from the local police guarding the border check post that there are about 200-250 people mainly women and children trying to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?(b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?(c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?(d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?
Ethics Case Studies
Options range from pushing everyone back to opening the gate to armed men; both extremes fail. The dilemma is non-refoulement and medical duty versus sovereignty and the risk of a ruse. The better path is triage and shelter for civilians, especially women and children, and separate internment of disarmed soldiers pending the Centre. Border police should keep distance, seal weapons, separate camps, and avoid humiliation or leaks. Waiting for a dead phone while a child bleeds is not caution; it is omission.
Q11 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Program, MGNREGA was earlier known as National Rural Employment Scheme, NREGA. It is an Indian Social Welfare Program that aimed at fulfilling the 'Right to Work' provisions made in the Constitution. MGNREGA was launched in 2006 under Rural Employment Sector by the Ministry of Rural Development. Main objective of the program is to give legal guarantee of wage employment to the adult members of rural households who are willing to do unskilled manual labour work subject to a maximum of 100 days per year for every household. Every rural household has the right to register under the scheme, job card is issued to the registered, Job Card holder can seek employment; State Government shall pay 25% of minimum wage for the first 30 days as compensatory daily unemployment allowance to the families and of wage for remaining period of the year. MGNREGA work was undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You have been appointed as an Administrator Incharge of the District. You have been given the responsibility of monitoring MGNREGA work undertaken by various Gram Panchayats. You are also given the authority to give technical sanctions to all MGNREGA works. In one of the Panchayats in your jurisdiction, you notice that your predecessor has mismanaged the Program in terms of: (i) Money not disbursed to actual job-seekers.(ii) Muster Rolls of the Labourers not properly maintained.(iii) Mismatch between the work done and payments made.(iv) Payments made to fictitious persons.(v) Job Cards were given without looking into the need of person.(vi) Mismanagement of funds and to the extent of siphoning of funds.(vii) Approved works that never existed. (a) What is your reaction to the above situation and how do you restore the proper functioning of MGNREGA Program in this regard?(b) What actions would you initiate, to solve the various issues listed above?(c) How would you deal with the above situation?
Ethics Case Studies
The first duty is to protect records, tell workers the truth, and stop further theft. Arrears must reach real job-seekers while ghosts, fake works and siphoned funds go to vigilance and the police. Job cards should be re-verified without stripping genuine households. The predecessor deserves due process, not a media hanging or a cover-up. Social audit, geotagging and a public dashboard keep the repair from rotting again.
Q10 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set-back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer-related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation?(b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case?(c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why?
Ethics Case Studies
Splitting ₹35 lakh into smaller bills to avoid the boss’s sanction is a GFR violation, even if it is a common trick. The ethical issues are career fear, a named vendor, and the habit of collective cheating. Rajesh’s options include splitting, lawful phasing, written illegal orders, or a proper sanction. The right choice is a single proposal to the competent authority and a competitive purchase. A promotion that needs a false indent is not worth the integrity it costs.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.