Revision summary
Raids failed because the belt is poor, dry and feud-ridden. A new SP should not unofficially legalise poison and should not only hit harder. The approach is mapped health data, strikes on methanol supply, livelihood and irrigation with the Collector, de-addiction, and impartial policing. Police integrity is part of the cure; protection money is part of the disease. Success is fewer deaths, not more cases.
Model answer
Introduction
Illicit liquor in this district is a public-health massacre wearing a law-and-order mask. Raids alone have already been tried. The new approach must dry the economic swamp, not only fill the lock-up.
Body
Stakeholders
- Drinkers, their families, and people who die from methanol and other poisons.
- Poor distillers, including women who may have no other cash.
- Communities in clash, who use liquor money and liquor gangs as muscle.
- Police, excise, health, agriculture and panchayat officers.
- Honest dry-law supporters and those who want a quiet bribe economy to continue.
Ethical issues and values
- Sanctity of life: unreported deaths are still deaths.
- Justice: punishing only the small cooker while the solvent supply lives is theatre.
- Empathy: a dry law that ignores hunger will be broken every night.
- Impartiality: raids that visit only one community will feed the next clash.
- Integrity: police who tax the still cannot lead a new approach.
Why the old approach failed
- Distillation here is livelihood, irrigation failure, and a feud economy, not only a hobby of crime.
- Cases without conviction, and convictions without an alternative wage, recycle the same families.
- Fear without services pushes the still further into the forest and the death rate stays.
Options
- Option 1: Harsher raids only.
- Merit: some fear.
- Demerit: already failed; invites fake encounters and communal targeting.
- Option 2: Ignore prohibition and unofficially "regulate" the stills.
- Merit: less police theatre.
- Demerit: you become a partner in poison and you break the law you swore to.
- Option 3: A whole-of-district plan: enforcement on supply of poison, livelihood and irrigation, health, and peace work.
- Merit: matches the causes named in the stem.
- Demerit: slower, needs other departments; still the right course.
Action: the new approach
- Map deaths, stills, solvent routes and community fault-lines with health data, not only FIR counts. Publish what can be published so the problem is not a police secret.
- Split the crime: hunt methanol and organised supply with excise and financial intelligence; treat the hungry small cooker as a person who needs an exit, not only a boot.
- Clean the force: rotate compromised posts, use independent raids, and invite complaints against protection money.
- Sit with the Collector, agriculture, rural development and women-and-child officers: irrigation repair, MGNREGA and skill work in the belt, so the still is not the only wage.
- De-addiction and emergency medicine: primary health centres stocked for poisoning, an ambulance that actually moves, and counselling that does not wait for a fatal batch.
- Community peace: liquor often funds feud. Use credible local peace committees, equal enforcement, and keep festivals from becoming revenge markets.
- Women's groups and youth clubs as monitors, not as unpaid spies of one caste.
- Schools and adult literacy so the next cohort is not trapped in the same cash-from-poison story.
- Ask the State, with evidence, whether prohibition without livelihood is producing methanol death; policy change is the legislature's, but the SP may not fake success.
- Measure success as fewer deaths and fewer hospitalised children, not as a taller pile of seized matkas.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DEATH[Illicit liquor deaths] --> OLD[Raids only] OLD --> FAIL[Problem unchanged] DEATH --> NEW[Supply plus livelihood plus health] NEW --> MAP[Map poison and poverty] NEW --> EXIT[Irrigation jobs de-addiction] NEW --> CLEAN[Clean police and equal raids]
Conclusion
Keep the law, but stop pretending the still is only a lathi problem. Cut poison supply, exit poor distillers into wages and water, treat the dying, and police both communities without a protection racket.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set up an additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to its detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition. The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water, and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitations demanding the closure of the plant. In a recent agitation, thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industries which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling these issues, how are you going to address it? (250 words).
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q10). View answer →
-
Is this the SP taking over development work?
The SP convenes and secures. Irrigation and jobs remain the Collector and line departments. Without them the police only harvest the poor.
-
Should the SP publicly oppose prohibition?
The SP may report evidence of harm to government. Open campaigning against a State law is not the uniform's job.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Edward Snowden, a computer expert, and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his "whistleblowing" by stating that he had a duty "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them." According to Snowden, the Government's violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden's actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case. (250 words). -
2018 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh is a responsible district-level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words). -
2018 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set up an additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to its detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition. The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water, and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitations demanding the closure of the plant. In a recent agitation, thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industries which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling these issues, how are you going to address it? (250 words). -
2018 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Dr. X is a leading medical practitioner in a city. He has set up a charitable trust through which he plans to establish a super-specialty hospital in the city to cater to the medical needs of all sections of society. Incidentally, that part of the State had been neglected over the years. The proposed hospital would be a boon for the region. You are heading the tax investigation agency of that region. During an inspection of the doctor's clinic, your officers have found out some major irregularities. A few of them are substantial which had resulted in considerable withholding of tax that should be paid by him now. The doctor is cooperative. He undertakes to pay the tax immediately. However, there are certain other deficiencies in his tax compliance that are purely technical in nature. If these technical defaults are pursued by the agency, considerable time and energy of the doctor will be diverted to issues that are not so serious, urgent, or even helpful to the tax collection process. Further, in all probability, it will hamper the prospects of the hospital coming up. There are two options before you: Taking a broader view, ensuring substantial tax compliance, and ignoring defaults that are merely technical in nature. Pursue the matter strictly and proceed on all fronts, whether substantial or merely technical. As the head of the tax agency, which course of action will you opt for and why? (250 words). -
2018 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. As a senior officer in the Ministry, you have access to important policy decisions and upcoming big announcements such as road construction projects before they are notified in the public domain. The Ministry is about to announce a mega road project for which the drawings are already in place. Sufficient care was taken by the planners to make use of the government land with the minimum land acquisition from private parties. The compensation rate for private parties was also finalized as per government rules. Care was also taken to minimize deforestation. Once the project is announced, it is expected that there will be a huge spurt in real estate prices in and around that area. Meanwhile, the Minister concerned insists that you realign the road in such a way that it comes closer to his 20 acres farmhouse. He also suggests that he would facilitate the purchase of a big plot of land in your wife's name at the prevailing rate which is very nominal, in and around the proposed mega road project. He also tries to convince you by saying that there is no harm in it as he is buying the land legally. He even promises to supplement your savings in case you do not have sufficient funds to buy the land. However, by the act of realignment, a lot of agricultural lands have to be acquired, thereby causing a considerable financial burden on the government, and also the displacement of the farmers. As if this is not enough, it will involve cutting down of a large number of trees denuding the area of its green cover. Faced with this situation, what will you do? Critically examine various conflicts of interest and explain what your responsibilities are as a public servant. (250 words). -
2017 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder. Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence. -
2017 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: (a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. (b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference. (c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals (d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. -
2017 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are aspiring to become an IAS officer and you have cleared various stages and now you have been selected for the personal interview. On the day of the interview, on the way to the venue you saw an accident where a mother and child who happen to be your relatives were badly injured. They needed immediate help. What would you have done in such a situation? Justify your action.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) State the three basic values, universal in nature, in the context of civil services and bring out their importance. (b) Distinguish between "Code of ethics" and "Code of conduct" with suitable examples.
Probity in Governance
The three universal civil-service values are integrity, impartiality and objectivity. Integrity is honest trusteeship; impartiality is equal treatment; objectivity is fact-and-law decisions with recorded reasons. They matter because public money, Article 14 equality and a file that can face a court all depend on them. A code of ethics states values; a code of conduct lists punishable do's and don'ts. Nolan and the Second ARC illustrate ethics; the CCS Conduct Rules, 1964 illustrate conduct.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by public interest? What are the principles and procedures to be followed by the civil servants in public interest? (b) "The Right to Information Act is not all about citizens' empowerment alone, it essentially redefines the concept of accountability. Discuss.
Probity in Governance
Public interest is the welfare of the whole community under the Constitution, not popularity or official prestige. Civil servants serve it through legality, impartiality, proportionality, recorded reasons, published criteria and a preference for the weakest. Upward reporting is not enough if the file stays secret. The RTI Act, 2005 empowers citizens to seek information and redefines accountability as an answer owed to the public. Suo motu disclosure, time limits and the Information Commission make that new accountability real, though exemptions and fear still weaken it.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by conflict of interest? Illustrate with examples, the difference between the actual and potential conflicts of interest. (b) "In looking for people to hire, you look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence and energy. And if they do not have the first, the other two will kill you." - Warren Buffett What do you understand by this statement in the present-day scenario? Explain.
Ethics in Public Administration
Conflict of interest is a private interest that can twist a public or fiduciary duty. Actual conflict is already operating on this decision; potential conflict is reasonably foreseeable even if today's file looks clean. The cure is disclosure, recusal, divestment and screens, not private hope. Buffett ranks integrity first because intelligence and energy multiply both service and fraud. Present-day scams, surveillance tools and mark-worshipping recruitment make that ranking more, not less, urgent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.